Affiliation:
1. Doctoral Program in Sustainable Management Systems Universidade Federal Fluminense Rua Passo da Pátria, 156, Niterói-RJ BRAZIL
Abstract
An agile system of multiple criteria decision analysis is proposed here. Its main component avoids the collection of field direct information about the importance of the criteria and of the interaction between criteria. This is replaced by a derivation of Choquet capacities to the sets of criteria from the preferences they assign to the alternatives evaluated. This indirect derivation is made possible by a rule to assess importance and interaction based on a principle of preference concentration. The agile applicability of the system is enhanced by the admission of the sampling of initial assessments by pairwise trichotomic comparisons. This possibility reduces the need to precisely measure distances and the care about transitivity. Finally, an ordering of the decision rules based on the facility of explanation of their results provides agility for the final step of the decision. An example of application of the system is given by the study of a case of supplier evaluation.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Reference23 articles.
1. Keeney, R. & Raiffa, H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, 1976.
2. Bronner, R. Decision making under time pressure. Lexington Books, 1982.
3. Eisenhardt, K. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1989, pp. 543-576.
4. Cohen, M., Freeman, J. & Wolf, S. Metarecognition in time-stressed decision making: recognizing, critiquing and correcting. Human Factors, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1996 pp. 206-219.
5. Lehner, P., Seyed-Solorforough, M., O’Connor, M., Sak, S. & Mullin, T. Cognitive biases and time stress in team decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 27, No. 5,1997, pp. 698-703.