Structure for Synonymous Flow Label (SFL)
Affiliation:
1. Electronics Engineering Department, Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur, India.
Abstract
Because of the very high loss rate in general activity, enhancements in connection and transmission innovations have made it more difficult to evaluate packet loss utilizing dynamic execution estimation techniques with plotted traffic. That, along with seriously requesting administration level necessities, implies that network administrators currently should have the option to quantify the loss of the actual user data traffic utilizing inactive execution estimation strategies. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) strategy portrays the prerequisite for presenting stream characters inside the MPLS architecture. This paper depicts a strategy for achieving this by utilizing a method called Synonymous Flow Label (SFL) in which names that imitate the conduct of different labels give the recognizable proof assistance. These identifiers can be utilized to trigger per stream procedure on the packet at the receiving label switching router.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Subject
General Computer Science
Reference11 articles.
1. Rosen, E., Tappan, D., Fedorkow, G., Rekhter, Y., Farinacci, D., Li, T., and A. Conta, “MPLS Label Stack Encoding”, RFC 3032, DOI 10.17487/RFC3032, January 2001. 2. Andersson, L. and R. Asati, "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Stack Entry: "EXP" Field Renamed to "Traffic Class" Field", RFC 5462, DOI 10.17487/RFC5462, February 2009. 3. Kompella, K., Drake, J., Amante, S., Henderickx, W., and L. Yong, "The Use of Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding", RFC 6790, DOI 10.17487/RFC6790, November 2012. 4. Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017. 5. Bryant, S., Swallow, G., and S. Sivabalan, "A Simple Control Protocol for MPLS SFLs", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-bryant-mpls-sflcontrol- 09, December 2020.
|
|