Transfer Learning Model Training Time Comparison for Osteoporosis Classification on Knee Radiograph of RGB and Grayscale Images
Author:
Abubakar Usman Bello1, Boukar Moussa Mahamat2, Adeshina Steve3, Dane Senol4
Affiliation:
1. Department of Computer Science, Baze University, Abuja, NIGERIA 2. Department of Computer Science, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, NIGERIA 3. Department of Computer Engineering, Nile University of Nigeria Abuja, NIGERIA 4. Department of Physiology, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, NIGERIA
Abstract
In terms of financial costs and human suffering, osteoporosis poses a serious public health burden. Reduced bone mass, degeneration of the microarchitecture of bone tissue, and an increased risk of fracture are its main skeletal symptoms. Osteoporosis is caused not just by low bone mineral density, but also by other factors such as age, weight, height, and lifestyle. Recent advancement in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has led to successful applications of expert systems that use Deep Learning techniques for osteoporosis diagnosis based on some modalities such as dental radiographs amongst others. This study uses a dataset of knee radiographs (i.e., knee-Xray images) to apply and compare the training time of two robust transfer learning model algorithms: GoogLeNet, VGG-16, and ResNet50 to classify osteoporosis. The dataset was split into two subcategories using python opencv library: Grayscale Images and Red Green Blue (RGB) images. From the scikit learn python analysis, the training time of the GoogLeNet model on grayscale images and RGB images was 42minutes and 50 minutes respectively. The VGG-16 model training time on grayscale images and RGB images was 37 minutes and 44 minutes respectively. In addition, to compare the diagnostic performance of the two models, several state-of-the-art neural networks metric was used.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Reference24 articles.
1. S. Gschmeissner and S. Photo Library, “Diagnosis, assessment and management of osteoporosis,” Prescriber, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 14–19, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1002/PSB.1815. 2. U. Föger-Samwald, P. Dovjak, U. Azizi-Semrad, K. Kerschan-Schindl, and P. Pietschmann, “Osteoporosis: Pathophysiology and therapeutic options,” EXCLI Journal, vol. 19, p. 1017, 2020, doi: 10.17179/EXCLI2020-2591. 3. E. M. Curtis, R. J. Moon, N. C. Harvey, and C. Cooper, “The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide,” Bone, vol. 104, pp. 29–38, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.024. 4. J. R. Curtis et al., “Longitudinal Trends in Use of Bone Mass Measurement Among Older Americans, 1999–2005,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1061–1067, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1359/JBMR.080232. 5. H. K. Lim, H. il Ha, S. Y. Park, and K. Lee, “Comparison of the diagnostic performance of CT Hounsfield unit histogram analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting osteoporosis of the femur,” European Radiology 2018 29:4, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1831–1840, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1007/S00330-018-5728-0.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Knee Osteoporosis Diagnosis Based on Deep Learning;International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems;2024-09-12 2. Improving the Accuracy of Animal Species Classification in Camera Trap Images Using Transfer Learning;2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA);2024-02-01 3. A Boxplot Metadata Configuration Impact on Time Series Forecasting and Transfer Learning;2023 27th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC);2023-07-19
|
|