Performance Analysis of Grid Configuration Wireless Sensor Network using Different Packet Frequency for Oil and Gas Downstream Pipeline
Author:
Vijayakumaran Thinesh1, Subramaniam Siva Kumar1, Feroz Farah Shahnaz1, Sujatha R.2
Affiliation:
1. Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Elektronik dan Komputer, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, MALAYSIA 2. Department of Embedded Technology (IoT and sensors specialization), Vellore Institute of Technology, Tiruvalam Rd, Katpadi, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632014, INDIA
Abstract
Over the most recent few years, there has been a shift away from utilizing costly links to communicate information from different sensors, including those estimating wind, vibration, temperature, and stickiness, to observing locales. This progress has been worked with by the reception of Wireless sensor networks (WSNs), which proposition expanded adaptability and more extensive inclusion capacities. In different businesses, these organizations have acquired ubiquity because of their flexibility. In particular, with regards to observing oil and gas offices, framework-based WSNs demonstrate profoundly appropriate for covering broad regions, especially inside the downstream period of the oil and gas handling chain. The essential point of this examination is to research how different bundle frequencies, the quantity of nodes, and directing conventions influence a lattice-based WSN. The review presents two sorts of steering conventions: responsive (AODV) and proactive (OLSR), utilizing a lattice hub plan and trying different things with different bundle frequencies. The reenactment results uncover that as the bundle recurrence builds, there is a perceptible decrease in execution, no matter what the organization's size. This presentation decline is clear in measurements like the conveyance proportion, network reasonableness, and the presence of aloof nodes inside the organization, particularly while sending 80 nodes or more. Moreover, it's significant that the AODV steering convention outflanks the OLSR partner concerning throughput, conveyance proportion, and the presence of passive nodes.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Reference24 articles.
1. W. Z. Khan, M. Y. Aalsalem, W. Gharibi, and Q. Arshad, “Oil and Gas monitoring using Wireless Sensor Networks: Requirements, issues and challenges,” Proceeding - 2016 Int. Conf. Radar, Antenna, Microwave, Electron. Telecommun. ICRAMET 2016, pp. 31–35, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICRAMET.2016.7849577. 2. M. Y. Aalsalem, W. Z. Khan, W. Gharibi, M. K. Khan, and Q. Arshad, “Wireless Sensor Networks in oil and gas industry: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 113, pp. 87–97, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.04.004. 3. M. Y. Lee, A. S. Azman, S. K. Subramaniam, and F. S. Feroz, “Wireless sensor networks in midstream and downstream in oil and gas industry,” Lect. Notes Mech. Eng., no. January, pp. 466–474, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9539-0_45. 4. A. Rayes and S. Salam, “Internet of thingsfrom hype to reality: The road to digitization,” Internet Things From Hype to Real. Road to Digit., pp. 1–328, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44860-2. 5. S. Rathore, M. Naiyar, and A. Ali, “Comparative study of entity and group mobility models in MANETs based on underlying reactive, proactive and hybrid routing schemes,” 2012 15th Int. Multitopic Conf. INMIC 2012, pp. 297–304, 2012, doi: 10.1109/INMIC.2012.6511451.
|
|