Critical analysis of River Basin Management Regulation in Bengawan Solo for Water Tourism: Local Legislation in 7 Regency
Author:
Absori Absori1, Hernanda Trias2, Wardiono Kelik1, Fitriciada Aidul1, Budiono Arief1
Affiliation:
1. Doctoral Program in Legal Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta 57169, Central Java, INDONESIA 2. Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kudus, Kudus, 59316, Central Java, INDONESIA
Abstract
Indonesia is a legal state in Southeast Asia. Therefore every policy that is born must be following applicable regulations, unfortunately, not all objects in Indonesia have regulations that govern and one of them is the Bengawan Solo watershed. This situation makes the Bengawan Solo watershed vulnerable to damage and difficult to develop. Even though the Bengawan Solo watershed has great potential, one of which is the development of water tourism. With natural conditions that support the development of water tourism, it is suitable to be developed in the Bengawan Solo watershed area, but before it is developed into water tourism, it should have special regulations for the sustainability of the Bengawan Solo watershed. This research is research that uses qualitative data and a critical legal approach, then coupled with field observations. The results of the research in this study are: (1) there are no specific rules regarding the Bengawan Solo watershed, but there are rules that are still general regarding Bengawan Solo management policies. (2) the potential for the development of water tourism in the Bengawan Solo watershed is quite potent and has an impact on the preservation of the Bengawn Solo watershed and provides additional income for the community. (3) the opportunity to make special regulations regarding the Bengawan Solo watershed still exists, because it can take as an example the presidential regulation regarding the Citarum watershed.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Subject
General Energy,General Environmental Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference35 articles.
1. K. Dimyati, H. Nashir, E. Elviandri, A. Absori, K. Wardiono, and A. Budiono, “Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 8, p. e07865, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865. 2. Trias Hernanda, “Legal Analysis On Amadal As An Environmental Protection Document,” Leg. Standing, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 108–115, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/LS/articl e/view/2980/1553. 3. S. Sloan et al., “Infrastructure development and contested forest governance threaten the Leuser Ecosystem, Indonesia,” Land use policy, vol. 77, no. December 2017, pp. 298– 309, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.043. 4. F. Leijten, S. Sim, H. King, and P. H. Verburg, “Local deforestation spillovers induced by forest moratoria: Evidence from Indonesia,” Land use policy, vol. 109, no. August, p. 105690, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105690. 5. T. Hernanda, “Environmental Legal Protection of Rivers in the Perspective of Sustainable Development,” vol. 11, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i1.14744.
|
|