Discourse on Human Rights Issues and Public Policy Context: Prospect of Indonesia Tobacco Control Regulation
Author:
Aryani Nyoman Mas1, Yusa I Gede1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Udayana University Jalan Pulau Bali Number 1, Sanglah, Denpasar, Bali 80114 INDONESIA
Abstract
The efforts on tobacco control are based on two main philosophies which are focused on human rights and the economy. This is observed for every country that is willing to reduce tobacco consumption and slightly ensure prosperity at the same time. It is being discussed in the international community that some countries are not a party to FCTC (Framework Convention on Tobacco Control) but have a domestic regulatory system for tobacco or are committed to implementing other obligations based on international norms at the minimum. This research specifically examined institutions and rules besides politics and judiciary enforcement in tobacco control regulation through the application of comparative and system approaches within the legal political context and a qualitative method. It was discovered that Indonesia has the ability to deliberate domestic regulatory systems to combat and reduce tobacco use despite the strong interference by tobacco industries and markets that are approaching legislatures, politicians, or executive apparatus to create different institutional interests. This usually leads to a mixture of verdict and judgment for the judiciary and legal enforcement.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Subject
General Energy,General Environmental Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference39 articles.
1. Mc Inerney, T.F., The WHO FCTC and global governance: effects and implications for future global public health instruments, Tobacco Control, 28(1), 2019, DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054358, s89-s93. 2. McIntyre, O., Transnational environmental regulation and the normativisation of global environmental governance standards The promise of order from chaos?, Journal of Property, Planning, and Environmental Law, 10(2), 2018, DOI 10.1108/JPPEL-01-2018- 0003, 92-112. 3. Garne, D., Watson, M., Chapman, S. & Byrne, F., Environmental tobacco smoke research published in the journal Indoor and Built Environment and associations with the tobacco industry, The Lancet, 365(1), 2005, pp. 804, 807-808. 4. Brown, G. (ed.), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the 21st Century: A Living Document in a Changing World, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, UK, DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0091, 55-56, 63-70, 2016. 5. Danishevskiy, K. & McKee, M., Tobacco: a product like any other? Health Economics, Policy, and Law, 6(3), 2011, DOI: 10.1017/S1744133111000053, 265–272.
|
|