Improvement of Aerodynamic Performance of NACA 2412 Airfoil using Active and Passive Control Techniques
Author:
T. Paramesh1, Tenzin Tshering1, Sarwar Mohammad1, Azizi Ahmad Mujeeb1, Getaneh Habte1, Jana Tamal2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Aerospace Engineering, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University) Bengaluru, INDIA 2. Department of Aerospace Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bengaluru, INDIA
Abstract
The study of aerodynamic characteristics plays a crucial role in the design and performance evaluation of various airfoil profiles. In this study, a comprehensive investigation of the modified NACA 2412 airfoil has been carried out, focusing on its aerodynamic characteristics and performance. To improve the aerodynamic characteristics and to delay the stall, active and passive control techniques are introduced. The computational investigation is carried out using commercial software Ansys Fluent. Especially, the Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) equation is numerically computed employing the K-omega SST turbulence model. The active control is implemented using four microjets, each having diameters of 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm, placed upstream of the flow separation location of the uncontrolled airfoil. The jet exit velocity is maintained the same as the freestream flow velocity. For each case, the tangential orientations of the jets are varied from 2 to 10 degrees with an increment of 2 degrees. Besides, the impact of jet separation distance is also evaluated. On the other hand, the passive control method is introduced by deploying vortex generators (VG) with varying heights of 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm, placed upstream of the separation location. Aerodynamic characteristics, including Lift, Drag, and Stall angle, are measured to assess performance. The study reveals that microjets with a diameter of 5 mm at a 2-degree tangential orientation perform best with a maximum of 11.33% increase in lift coefficient (Cl). For all the three sizes of microjets, the drag coefficients (Cd) are minimum for 2-degree tangential orientation. Besides, the vortex generator of height 2 mm demonstrates superior performance with a maximum of 4% increase in lift coefficient. For both cases, the stall angle of the airfoil is delayed by 28.57%. In addition, except 2mm height of the vortex generator, all other vortex generators lead to an increase in drag coefficient. Importantly, the microjets are proved to be more efficient than the vortex generator in delaying the flow separation thereby reducing the drag and increasing the aerodynamic efficiency of the airfoil.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Reference15 articles.
1. Abbott, I.H., and Von Doenhoff, A.E., Theory of Wing Sections, Dover Publications, New York, 1959. 2. Seetharam H. C., E. J. Rodgers, and W. H. Wentz Jr., Experimental studies of flow separation of the NACA 2412 airfoil at low speeds, No. AR 77-3, NASA-CR-197497, 1977. 3. Parthasarathy, T., and S. P. Das, Some aspects of flow control over a NACA0015 airfoil using synthetic jets. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, Fifteenth Asian Congress of Fluid Mechanics (15ACFM), Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia Vol.822, No.1, 2017. 4. Montazer, Elham Mirzaei, Masoud & Salami, Erfan Ward, Thomas Romli, Fairuz Kazi, S.N., Optimization of a synthetic jet actuator for flow control around an airfoil., IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. AEROTECH VI - Innovation in Aerospace Engineering and Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Vol. 152, 2016. 5. Shih, C, Beahn, J, Krothapalli, A, & Chandrasekhara, MS., Control of Compressible Dynamics Stall Using Microjets, Proceedings of the ASME/JSME 2003 4th Joint Fluids Summer Engineering Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. Vol.2, 2003, pp. 1141-1146.
|
|