Abstract
The Keynesian expenditure multiplier is commonly viewed as a mechanism that amplifies expansionary fiscal or monetary policy. Once the assumptions on which the multiplier rests are applied to the classical quantity equation, however, it becomes obvious that the Keynesian multiplier is by far more pessimistic in this regard than the quantity equation. In light of this comparison, it makes much more sense to speak of the Keynesian “diminisher” than of the “multiplier.” The reason for the pessimistic bias of the multiplier can best be detected if the distinction is made between a one-time expansionary policy measure and a permanent one. It is only because of this pessimistic bias that the Keynesian “multiplier” can be used to justify permanent government spending programs.
Publisher
Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference42 articles.
1. ABAY-NEUBAUER, Julius. Der wirtschaftliche Kreislauf auf geldlicher und sachlicher Grundlage (II). Journal of Contextual Economics, Berlin, v. 81, n. 6, p. 81-99, 1961. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.81.6.81
2. ABAY-NEUBAUER, Julius. Investitionen und Wachstum. Journal of Contextual Economics, Berlin, v. 85, n. 5, p. 557-573, 1965. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.85.5.557
3. ACKLEY, Gardner. The multiplier time period: money, inventories, and flexibility. The American Economic Review, Nashville, v. 41, n. 3, p. 350-368, 1951.
4. ALFORD, R. F. G. A taxonomic note on the multiplier and income velocity. Economica, Chichester, v. 27, n. 105, p. 53-62, 1960. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551427
5. ANGELL, James W. Investment and business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1941.