Legal assessment of the conclusion of the forensic examination

Author:

Bаkit S. B.1ORCID,Аlаyеvа G. T.1ORCID,Zhаnibеcоv A. K.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Turan University

2. Al-Farabi KazNU,

Abstract

This research topic focuses on the legal assessment of the conclusions of the forensic examination, presenting an analysis of the importance and impact of forensic expert conclusions in legal practice. The present study delves into the intricacies of conducting a forensic examination, encompassing its aims and methodology. Additionally, it scrutinizes matters pertaining to the admissibility, dependability, and interpretation of expert opinions within court proceedings. The primary legal facets associated with the role of forensic examination in ascertaining facts and evidence in legal cases, along with potential ramifications for the involved parties, are thoroughly analyzed. The findings of this investigation furnish valuable insightsfor a more profound comprehension of the significance of forensic examination in legal proceedings, as well as the crucial role played by reliable and precise expert opinions in upholding equity and justice. The study discusses the regulatory and legislative environment that governs forensic examination, including the qualification requirements for experts and the procedures for their appointment. The study also highlights the importance of the neutrality and objectivity of experts, as well as the need to ensure their independence from the parties to the process. Potential challenges and problems related to expert opinions are highlighted, such as conflicts of interest and the possibility of expert errors. As a result, this study highlights the importance of forensic expertise in court proceedings and its impact on judicial decision-making. Practical recommendations and measures that can improve the quality and reliability of expert opinions are analyzed, contributing to a more fair and effective legal process. 

Publisher

Turan University

Reference10 articles.

1. Bednjakov I.L. (2017) Teorija dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom processe. – Samara: Samarskij juridicheskij institut FSIN Rossii, 152 p. (In Russian).

2. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Qylmystyq-prosestık kodeksi Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Kodeksı 2014 jylğy 4 şıldedegı No. 231-V QRZ. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1400000231. (In Kazakh).

3. Cot-saraptama qyzmetı turaly Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Zañy 2017 jylğy 10 aqpandağy No. 44-VI QRZ. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/Z1700000044. (In Kazakh).

4. Maslennikova L.N. (2017) Dokazyvanie i prinjatie reshenij v sostjazatel'nom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Norma, 384 p. (In Russian).

5. Şakirov K.N.,TapalovaR.B. Mergembaeva N.B.(2012) QazaqstanRespublikasyndağy Sotsaraptamasy: ūiymdastyryluy jäne öndırısı. Almaty: äl-Farabi atyndağy QazŪU, 230 p. (In Kazakh).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3