Measuring Poly-tobacco Product Use with Ecological Momentary Assessment

Author:

Griffiths Nicholas G.1,Fetterman Jessica L.2,Vargees Comreen3,Kathuria Hasmeena4,Grodal Stine5,Borrelli Belinda6,Ross Craig S.7

Affiliation:

1. Research Assistant, Boston University School of Public Health, Epidemiology Department, Boston, MA, United States.

2. Assistant Professor, Boston University School of Medicine, Evans Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston, MA, United States.

3. Clinical Research Coordinator, Boston University School of Medicine, Evans Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston, MA, United States.

4. Associate Professor, Boston University School of Medicine, Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep, & Critical Care Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

5. Associate Professor, Boston University Questrom School of Business, Strategy and Innovation Department, Boston, MA, United States.

6. Professor, Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Center for Behavioral Science Research, Boston, MA, United States.

7. Research Assistant Professor, Boston University School of Public Health, Epidemiology Department, Boston, MA, United States.

Abstract

Objectives: Poly-tobacco product use is common among tobacco users, but it is challenging to assess patterns of use in real-life contexts. The objective of this study is to determine whether intensive longitudinal methods are feasible for assessing concurrent use of multiple tobacco products. Methods: Overall, 28 participants completed a baseline questionnaire and 7 days of ecological momentary assessment data collection, including end-of-day, random, and real-time reporting. Results: When estimating use of cigarettes, vaping products, and other products individually, there were moderate correlations between baseline questionnaire estimates, end-of-day estimates, and random estimates (ρ= 0.379–0.640); however, daily totals of all products combined were poorly correlated (ρ = 0.198–0.461). Baseline questionnaire estimates were higher than random estimates for each product (median difference 1.5–7.0 products per day). End-of-day estimates were more consistent with the baseline questionnaire. There was low compliance with real-time product use reports. Conclusions: Random or daily reporting are feasible for poly-tobacco use assessment, but methods are needed to reconcile differences in estimates. Accurate measurement of poly-tobacco product use is needed to assess health impacts and inform policy.

Publisher

JCFCorp SG PTE LTD

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Health (social science)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3