Comparison of airborne gravity processing results by GravPRO and Newton software packages

Author:

Zhong Detang1,Damiani Theresa Marie2,Preaux Sandra Ann Martinka2,Kingdon Robert William3

Affiliation:

1. Fugro Geospatial, Inc., Lafayette, Louisiana, USA..

2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA..

3. University of New Brunswick, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada..

Abstract

Zero-length spring gravity sensors, such as the Micro-g LaCoste Turnkey Airborne Gravity System (TAGS), are widely used in airborne gravimetry applications due to their virtually drift-free characteristics. However, the quality of the final gravity product depends on the methods chosen to correct for several dynamic effects, including the Eötvös correction, the vertical acceleration correction of the moving aircraft, and the instrument platform tilt correction. For geodetic applications using regional gravity field mapping for geoid determination, the choices of correction method are extremely important because the flights are done uncommonly high and fast. For this reason, and in support of the Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) project, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Geodetic Survey (NGS), and Fugro Geospatial have independently developed airborne gravity processing software packages for TAGS data — called Newton and GravPRO, respectively. We have evaluated the airborne gravity data processing methods that are used in the two software packages. We processed a GRAV-D data set collected by NGS over Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico in 2008 with both packages, we compared the results for each major data correction applied, and we evaluated unique add-on features and tools. The results determined that the two software packages were very comparable, both yielding an excellent crossover root-mean-square of 1.8 mGal without any crossover adjustment applied. For the worst 14% of survey lines, which had higher levels of aircraft dynamics during flight, GravPRO was able to retain more data due to advantages in its platform tilt correction method. Also, GravPRO’s instrument calibration function, which is based on crossover error analysis, found a 45% improvement in achievable survey precision from approximately 2 mGal to approximately 1 mGal when comparing the test data set to a global gravity model.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Reference34 articles.

1. A comparison of recent Earth gravitational models with emphasis on their contribution in refining the gravity and geoid at continental or regional scale

2. Bayoud, F. A., 2001, Some investigations on local geoid determination from airborne gravity data: M.S. thesis, University of Calgary, http://www.ucalgary.ca/engo_webdocs/MGS/01.20154.FBayoud.pdf.

3. Bruton, A., 2000, Improving the accuracy and resolution of SINS/DGPS airborne gravimetry: Ph.D. thesis, University of Calgary, http://www.ucalgary.ca/engo_webdocs/KPS/00.20145.AMBruton.pdf, accessed 24 March 2015.

4. Childers, V. A., 1996, Gravimetry as a geophysical tool: Airborne gravimetry and studies of lithospheric flexure and faulting: Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.

5. Airborne gravimetry: An investigation of filtering

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3