Geophysical basin modeling: Effective stress, temperature, and pore pressure uncertainty

Author:

De Prisco Giuseppe1,Thanoon David2,Bachrach Ran2,Brevik Ivar3,Clark Stephen A.3,Corver Maarten P.4,Pepper Randolph E. F.2,Hantschel Thomas5,Helgesen Hans Kristian3,Osypov Konstantin6,Leirfall Olav K.3

Affiliation:

1. Statoil, Houston, Texas, USA..

2. Schlumberger PTS, Houston, Texas, USA..

3. Statoil, Trondheim, Norway..

4. Formerly Statoil, Trondheim, Norway; presently Aramco Overseas Company B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands..

5. Schlumberger, Aachen, Germany..

6. Formerly Schlumberger PTS; presently Chevron, Houston, Texas, USA..

Abstract

Seismic interpretation is a complex process, in which many data types are considered and integrated to create a structural and/or stratigraphic model. In many cases, interpreters rely only on a seismic image or its attributes obtained after data processing and migration. Traditionally, interpretation was started after seismic imaging with little feedback to the seismic imaging process. However, modern depth imaging and tomography require integrating geologic concepts and constraints into the imaging process. Interaction between an interpreter, earth-model builder, and depth imager becomes necessary to improve the accuracy of seismic-derived structures and stratigraphic models. We have developed an example of closing the loop between geophysics and geology via a 3D geophysical basin modeling workflow that uses geologic concepts and rock-physics modeling to estimate a prior anisotropic seismic velocity model. In addition, the use of a geomechanical model to understand stress regimes in the area of interest and to map stress perturbations into a velocity perturbation ensures a stress-consistent earth model. Because the predictive capability of a numerical simulator was strictly related to the quantification of uncertainties related to its inputs (e.g., geometry, boundary conditions, and constitutive laws), uncertainty should be quantified at basin-length scales and geologic time scales. We used the Logan prospect in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico as an example to demonstrate the workflow.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geology,Geophysics

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Bayesian geophysical basin modeling with seismic kinematic metrics to quantify uncertainty for pore pressure prediction;GEOPHYSICS;2023-09-06

2. Seismic horizons depth positioning analysis for Bayesian geophysical basin modeling;Proceedings of the 14th SEGJ International Symposium, Online, 18–21 October 2021;2021-11-29

3. Dimensionless Coordinate Transformation of 1D Basin Modeling Equation;Quantitative Analysis of Geopressure for Geoscientists and Engineers;2021-03-11

4. Basic Definitions;Quantitative Analysis of Geopressure for Geoscientists and Engineers;2021-03-11

5. Empirical Relations for Fluid (Brine, Oil, Gas) Properties;Quantitative Analysis of Geopressure for Geoscientists and Engineers;2021-03-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3