Affiliation:
1. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, La Plata, Argentina and CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.(corresponding author); .
2. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, La Plata, Argentina..
Abstract
Well-to-seismic tie and wavelet phase estimation are closely related steps that link geology and seismic data. Usually, these processes are solved separately or alternately, diminishing the quality of the well-tying procedure. Apart from trying different wavelets, the well-to-seismic tie involves shifting and, often, stretching and/or squeezing the synthetic data until the correlation with the observed trace is high. These operations, which are somewhat arbitrary and prone to human errors, may lead to unrealistic velocity models and undesired waveform deformations. The automatic tying method that we propose avoids these issues allowing us to simultaneously adjust the wavelet phase and the velocity log within a predefined tolerance. The problem is solved iteratively by perturbing the observed velocity log and the wavelet phase in a way that leads to an increase of the correlation coefficient between the seismic data and the synthetic seismogram. The velocity log is perturbed smoothly using a function defined by monotonic cubic splines, whereas the wavelet phase is assumed to be an unknown constant. We solve the resulting optimization problem by means of differential evolution, which allows us to have complete control over the allowable velocity changes and guarantees that the measured borehole observations are well-honored. By means of pseudosynthetic and field data examples, we found that our automatic well-to-seismic tying method leads to high correlation values between the synthetic and the observed traces, accurate wavelet phase estimations, and small departures from the observed velocity log. Because it is the time scale that is stretched and/or squeezed and not the synthetic trace itself, as opposed to other automatic and manual well-tying methods, the resulting trace preserves the wavelet shape, a feature that certainly improves seismic data interpretation.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference32 articles.
1. Berndt, D., and J. Clifford, 1994, Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series: Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Technical Report, 359–370.
2. Tutorial: Wavelet estimation for well ties
3. Brunini, G., J. Sabbione, and D. Velis, 2017, Differential evolution for microseismic event location: XVII Workshop on Information Processing and Control (RPIC), Expanded Abstracts, 1–6.
4. Did you smooth your well logs the right way for seismic interpretation?
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献