Affiliation:
1. King AbdulAziz City of Science and Technology (KACST), Astronomy and Geophysics Research Institute, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
2. Stanford University, Stanford Exploration Project, Stanford, California 94305‐2215.
Abstract
The azimuth‐moveout (AMO) operator, unlike the dip‐moveout (DMO) operator, has a 3D structure in homogeneous isotropic media, with an out‐of‐plane (crossline) component. In general, this component is concave downward, giving the operator an overall skewed‐saddle shape. The AMO operator, necessary for azimuth correction only, is typically smaller in size than conventional DMO operators, which corresponds to purely offset correction to zero offset. When velocity varies vertically, the operator shape changes depending on the degree of velocity variation. The general shape of the operator, however, remains saddlelike. In fact, for smooth velocity increases with depth, similar to those found in the Gulf of Mexico, the v(z) AMO operator does not differ much from its homogeneous counterpart. In this case, the residual AMO operator, constructed by cascading a forward homogeneous AMO operator with an inverse v(z) one, is extremely small, which suggests that the impact of such v(z) variations on the AMO operator is generally small. Complex vertical velocity variations, on the other hand, result in more complicated AMO operators that include, among other things, triplications at moderate angles. Regardless of the complexity of the model, the v(z) operator has the same first‐order behavior as its homogeneous counterpart. As a result, for small dip angles the homogeneous AMO, as a tool for partial stacking, often enhances the image. Moderate to steep dips in complex v(z) media requires the application of an algorithm that honors such velocity variations.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference5 articles.
1. Artley, C., Blondel, P., Popovici, A. M., and Schwab, M., 1993, Equations for three dimensional dip moveout in depth‐variable velocity media: SEP‐77, 43–48.
2. Biondi, B., 1998, Azimuth moveout vs. dip moveout in inhomogeneous media: Stanford Exploration Project Report SEP 97, 83–94.
3. Azimuth moveout for 3-D prestack imaging
4. Deregowski, S. M., 1995, An integral implementation of dip moveout, in Hale, D., Ed., DMO processing: SEG, 177–188.
5. Hanson, D. W., and Witney, S. A., 1995, 3‐D prestack depth migration—Velocity model building and case history: 1995 Spring Symposium of the Geophysical Society of Tulsa, SEG, Seismic Depth Estimation, 27–52.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献