Ground-truth uncertainty-aware metrics for machine learning applications on seismic image interpretation: Application to faults and horizon extraction

Author:

Guillon Sébastien1,Joncour Frédéric1,Barrallon Pierre-Emmanuel1,Castanié Laurent1

Affiliation:

1. Total E&P Research and Technology USA, Palo Alto, California, USA..

Abstract

We propose new metrics to measure the performance of a deep learning model applied to seismic interpretation tasks such as fault and horizon extraction. Faults and horizons are thin geologic boundaries (1 pixel thick on the image) for which a small prediction error could lead to inappropriately large variations in common metrics (precision, recall, and intersection over union). Through two examples, we show how classical metrics could fail to indicate the true quality of fault or horizon extraction. Measuring the accuracy of reconstruction of thin objects or boundaries requires introducing a tolerance distance between ground truth and prediction images to manage the uncertainties inherent in their delineation. We therefore adapt our metrics by introducing a tolerance function and illustrate their ability to manage uncertainties in seismic interpretation. We compare classical and new metrics through different examples and demonstrate the robustness of our metrics. Finally, we show on a 3D West African data set how our metrics are used to tune an optimal deep learning model.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geology,Geophysics

Reference17 articles.

1. A machine-learning benchmark for facies classification

2. Automated fault detection without seismic processing

3. SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation

4. Civitarese, D., D. Szwarcman, E. V. Brazil, and B. Zadrozny, 2019, Semantic segmentation of seismic images: arXiv:1905.04307.

5. Di, H., 2018, Developing a seismic pattern interpretation network (SpiNet) for automated seismic interpretation: arXiv:1810.08517.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3