Multiseparation, multisystem electromagnetic depth sounding‐An extension for unification

Abstract

A recent definition of controlled‐source electromagnetic apparent resistivity has been adopted, and it is shown that this definition is unique. It produces a single apparent resistivity value by transforming any of the given combinations of the mutual coupling ratios measured by five different source‐receiver configurations, namely, horizontal coplanar loops (HCP), vertical coplanar loops (VCP), vertical coaxial loops (VCA), electric dipole source and horizontal receiver loop (EDL), and central loop (in‐loop) configurations. Synthetic field data for the commercially available MaxMin system, which can be operated with HCP, VCP, and VCA configurations, are fabricated and they are transformed to apparent resistivities. An analysis of apparent resistivity curves so obtained reveals the requirements of the ranges of frequencies and transmitter‐receiver separations needed for given exploration depth. A concise analysis of the effect of the random noise errors in the MaxMin data on stability of apparent resistivity is carried out. From this analysis, it is expected that apparent resistivities from field measurements will be stable, even when the measurements are corrupted with random noises.