Evidence-based guidelines for protective actions and earthquake early warning systems

Author:

McBride Sara K.1ORCID,Smith Hollie2,Morgoch Meredith2,Sumy Danielle3,Jenkins Mariah1,Peek Lori4,Bostrom Ann5,Baldwin Dare6,Reddy Elizabeth7,de Groot Robert1,Becker Julia8,Johnston David8,Wood Michele9

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, USA.(corresponding author); .

2. University of Oregon, School of Journalism and Communication, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA..

3. Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, Washington, D.C. 20005, USA..

4. University of Colorado Boulder, Natural Hazards Center, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0483, USA..

5. University of Washington, Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA..

6. University of Oregon, School of Psychology, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA..

7. Colorado School of Mines, Engineering, Design, and Society, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA..

8. Massey University, School of Psychology, Wellington 6140, New Zealand..

9. Cal State Fullerton, College of Health and Human Development, Fullerton, California 92834, USA..

Abstract

Earthquake early warning (EEW) systems are becoming increasingly available or are in development throughout the world. As these systems develop, it is important to provide evidence-based recommendations for protective action so people know how to protect themselves when they receive an alert. However, many factors need to be considered when developing contextually relevant and appropriate recommendations. We have reviewed earthquake injury reports, protective action and communication theories, and behavioral research to determine what factors can guide inquiry and decision making when developing protective action guidelines. Factors that emerge from relevant literature include: (1) social, cultural, and environmental context, such as which people are present, what their social roles are, and in what type of building they are located when an earthquake happens, (2) demographic and experiential variables, such as gender and age as well as previous history with earthquakes; and (3) magnitude and intensity that influence the duration and impacts of the earthquake itself. Although we examine data from around the world, we focus largely on evidence-based recommendations for the U.S. system, ShakeAlert, because it provides a timely case study for understanding how people receive and respond to EEW messages. In addition to synthesizing relevant literature, we recommend pathways forward for this interdisciplinary research community that explores EEW and its application around the world. Consistency in collecting and reporting injury data globally may assist in aligning this fragmented literature to develop a richer understanding of how demographic, cultural, seismic, engineering, and technological issues can be addressed to reduce human suffering due to earthquakes.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Cited by 56 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3