Affiliation:
1. University of Alberta.
Abstract
Understanding the source mechanisms of microseismic events is important for understanding the fracturing behavior and evolving stress field within a reservoir, knowledge of which can help to improve production and minimize seismic risk. The most common method for calculating the source mechanisms is moment-tensor inversion, which can provide the magnitudes, modes, and orientations of fractures. An overview of three common methods includes their advantages and limitations: the first-arrival polarity method, amplitude methods, and the full-waveform method. The first-arrival method is the quickest to implement but also the crudest, likely producing the least reliable results. Amplitude methods are also relatively simple but can better constrain the inversion because of the increased number of observations, especially those using S/P amplitude ratios. Full-waveform methods can provide results of very good quality, including source-time functions, but involve much more complex and expensive calculations and rely on accurate seismic-velocity models.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Reference9 articles.
1. Aki, K., and P. G. Richards, 2002, Quantitative seismology, 2nd ed.: University Science Books.
2. Barth, A., J. Reinecker, and O. Heidbach, 2008, World Stress Map project guideline: Stress derivation from earthquake focal mechanisms, http://dc-app3-14.gfz-potsdam.de/pub/guidelines/WSM_analysis_guideline_focal_mechanisms.pdf, accessed 8 July 2015.
3. Scaling relations and spectral characteristics of tensile microseisms: evidence for opening/closing cracks during hydraulic fracturing
4. A brittle failure model for long-period seismic events recorded at Turrialba Volcano, Costa Rica
5. Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献