Affiliation:
1. Ikon Science Americas, Houston, Texas, USA..
2. Energy and Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA..
Abstract
Understanding the behavior of CO2 injected into a reservoir and delineating its spatial distribution are fundamentally important in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and CO2 capture and sequestration activities. Interdisciplinary geoscience collaboration and well-defined workflows, from data acquisition to reservoir simulation, are needed to effectively handle the challenges of EOR fields and envisioned future commercial-scale sites for planned and incidental geologic CO2 storage. Success of operations depends on decisions that are based on good understanding of geologic formation heterogeneities and fluid and pressure movements in the reservoir over large areas over time. We present a series of workflow steps that optimize the use of available data to improve and integrate the interpretation of facies, injection, and production effects in an EOR application. First, we construct a simulation-to-seismic model supported by rock physics to model the seismic signal and signal quality needed for 4D monitoring of fluid and pressure changes. Then we use Bayesian techniques to invert the baseline and monitor seismic data sets for facies and impedances. To achieve a balance between prior understanding of the reservoir and the recorded time-lapse seismic data, we invert the seismic data sets by using multiple approaches. We first invert the seismic data sets independently, exploring sensible parameter scenarios. With the resulting realizations, we develop a shared prior model to link the reservoir facies geometry between seismic vintages upon inversion. Then we utilize multirealization analysis methods to quantify the uncertainties of our predictions. Next, we show how data may be more deeply interrogated by using the facies inversion method to invert prestack seismic differences directly for production effects. Finally, we show and discuss the feedback loop for updating the static and dynamic reservoir simulation model to highlight the integration of geophysical and engineering data within a single model.
Funder
U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Reference32 articles.
1. Alfi, M., S. A. Hosseini, M. Alfi, and M. Shakiba, 2015, Effectiveness of 4D seismic data to monitor CO2plume in Cranfield CO2-EOR project: Carbon Management Technology Conference, Extended Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.7122/439559-MS/.
2. Rock-physics modeling of stress sensitivity and 4D time shifts in patchy cemented sandstones — Application to the Visund Field, North Sea
3. The value of 4D seismic: Has the promise been fulfilled?
4. Cantillo, J., 2011, A quantitative discussion on time-lapse repeatability and its metrics: 81st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4160–4164, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3628075.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献