Integrated reservoir characterization of a Utica Shale field

Author:

Zhu Jinming1

Affiliation:

1. Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA..

Abstract

We performed an integrated multidisciplinary study for reservoir characterization of a Utica Shale field in eastern Ohio covered by a multiclient 3D seismic data set acquired in 2015. Elastic seismic inversion was performed in-house for effective reservoir characterization of the Utica Shale, which covers the interval from the top of Upper Utica (UUTIC) to the top of Trenton Limestone. Accurate, high-fidelity inversion results were obtained, including acoustic impedance, shear impedance, density, and VP/VS. These consistent inversion results allow for the reliable calculation of geomechanical and petrophysical properties of the reservoir. The inverted density clearly divides the Point Pleasant (PPLS) interval as low density from the overlying UUTIC Shale interval. Both Poisson's ratio (PR) and brittleness unmistakably separate the underlying PPLS from the overlying Utica interval. The PPLS Formation is easier to hydraulically fracture due to its much lower PR. Sequence S4 is the best due to its higher Young's modulus to sustain the open fractures. The calculated petrophysical volumes indisputably delineate the traditional Utica Shale into two distinctive sections. The upper section, the UUTIC, can be described as having 1%–2% total organic carbon (TOC), 3.5%–4.8% porosity, 10%–24% water saturation, and 40%–58% clay content. The lower section, PPLS, can be described as having 3%–4.5% TOC, 5%–9% porosity, 2%–10% water saturation, and about 15%–35% clay content. Both sections exhibit spatial variation of the properties. Nevertheless, the underlying PPLS is obviously a significantly better reservoir and operationally easier to produce.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geology,Geophysics

Reference7 articles.

1. Chopra, S., R. Sharma, M. Nemati, and J. Keay, 2017, Seismic reservoir characterization of Utica-Point Pleasant Shale with efforts at quantitative interpretation — A case study: 77th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4007–4011, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17734260.1.

2. EIA, 2017, Utica Shale play: Geology review, https://www.eia.gov/maps/pdf/uticashaleplayreport_april2017.pdf, accessed 20 January 2018.

3. Patchen, D. G., and K. M. Carter, 2015, A geologic play book for Utica Shale Appalachian Basin exploration: Final report of the Utica Shale Appalachian Basin exploration consortium, http://www.wvgs.wvnet.edu/utica, accessed 20 January 2018.

4. Rickman, R., M. J. Mullen, J. E. Petre, W. V. Grieser, and D. Kundert, 2008, A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: All shale plays are not clones of the Barnett Shale: Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE, 115258-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/115258-MS.

5. Wickstrom, L., 2013, Geology and activity of the Utica-Point Pleasant of Ohio, http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2013/10490wickstrom/ndx_wickstrom.pdf, accessed 16 December 2017.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3