Affiliation:
1. Johann Wolfgang Goethe‐University, Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, Feldbergstr. 47, D‐60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Abstract
In geophysics, the geoelectric (dc), magnetotelluric (MT), and transient electromagnetic (TEM) measuring procedures are commonly used to investigate electrical properties of the ground. Finite difference codes are available for all these methods and, in this paper, the data obtained from numerical simulations are compared with regard to two‐component cubic random lattices. Provided the usage of a convenient normalization procedure, it was expected that in case of statistically homogeneous and isotropic random lattices dc, MT, and TEM would yield the same results. Surprisingly, this is not true for the MT data; the lowest MT conductivities are only one‐fifth of the corresponding TEM values.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献