Coupled geomechanics and flow simulation for time‐lapse seismic modeling
-
Published:2004-01
Issue:1
Volume:69
Page:200-211
-
ISSN:0016-8033
-
Container-title:GEOPHYSICS
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:GEOPHYSICS
Author:
Minkoff Susan E.1, Stone C. Mike2, Bryant Steve3, Peszynska Malgorzata4
Affiliation:
1. University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, Maryland 21250. 2. Sandia National Laboratories, Computational Solid Mechanics and Structural Dynamics Department 9142, Mail Stop 0847, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185. 3. University of Texas at Austin, Center for Subsurface Modeling, Institute for Computational and Engineering Sciences (ICES), Austin, Texas 78712. 4. Formerly University of Texas at Austin, Center for Subsurface Modeling, Institute for Computational and Engineering Sciences (ICES), Austin, Texas 78712; presently Oregon State University, Department of Mathematics, Corvallis, Oregon 97331‐4605.
Abstract
To accurately predict production in compactible reservoirs, we must use coupled models of fluid flow and mechanical deformation. Staggered‐in‐time loose coupling of flow and deformation via a high‐level numerical interface that repeatedly calls first flow and then mechanics allows us to leverage the decades of work put into individual flow and mechanics simulators while still capturing realistic coupled physics. These two processes are often naturally modeled using different time stepping schemes and different spatial grids—flow should only model the reservoir, whereas mechanics requires a grid that extends to the earth's surface for overburden loading and may extend further than the reservoir in the lateral directions. Although spatial and temporal variability between flow and mechanics can be difficult to accommodate with full coupling, it is easily handled via loose coupling. We calculate the total stress by adding pore pressures to the effective rock stress. In turn, changes in volume strain induce updates to porosity and permeability and, hence, dynamically alter the flow solution during simulation. Incorporating the resulting time‐dependent pressures, saturations, and porosities (from coupled flow and mechanics) into Gassmann's equations results in seismic wave velocities and densities that can differ markedly from those calculated from flow alone. In a synthetic numerical experiment based on Belridge field, California, incorporation of coupled flow and mechanical deformation into time‐lapse calculations produces compressional wave velocities that differ markedly from those produced by flow alone. In fact, it is the closing of the pores themselves (reduction in permeability) in this example which has the greatest impact on fluid pressures and saturations and, hence, elastic wave parameters such as velocity.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference43 articles.
1. Arbogast, T., Wheeler, M., and Yotov, I., 1996, Logically rectangular mixed methods for flow in heterogeneous domains in Aldama, A., Aparicio, J., Brebbia, C. A., Gray, W. G., Herrera, I., and Pinder, G. F., Eds., Computational methods in water resources XI: Computational Mechanics Publications, 621–628. 2. Arguello, J., Stone, C., and Fossum, A., 1998, Progress on the development of a three‐dimensional capability for simulating large‐scale complex geologic processes: 3rd North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, Proceedings, Paper USA‐327‐3. 3. Repeatability of 3-D ocean‐bottom cable seismic surveys 4. Biffle, J., 1993, JAC3D—A three‐dimensional finite element computer program for the nonlinear quasistatic response of solids with the conjugate gradient method: Sandia National Labs Technical Report SAND87‐1305. 5. Birch, F., 1966, Compressibility; elastic constants, in Clark, S. P., Ed., Handbook of physical constants: Geological Society of America, 97–173.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|