Advanced inversion methods for airborne electromagnetic exploration

Author:

Sengpiel Klaus‐Peter1,Siemon Bernhard2

Affiliation:

1. Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Stilleweg 2, D-30655 Hannover, Germany.

2. Geophysik GGD, Hamburger Allee 12-16, D-30161 Hannover.

Abstract

Airborne electromagnetic (AEM) surveys can contribute substantially to geologic mapping and target identification if good‐quality multifrequency data are produced, properly evaluated, and displayed. A set of multifrequency EM data is transformed into a set of apparent resistivity ([Formula: see text]) and centroid depth ([Formula: see text]) values, which then are plotted as a sounding curve. These [Formula: see text] curves commonly provide a smoothed picture of the vertical resistivity distribution at the sounding site. We have developed and checked methods to enhance the sensitivity of sounding curves to vertical resistivity changes by using new definitions for apparent resistivity and centroid depth. One of these new sounding curves with enhanced sensitivity to vertical resistivity contrasts is plotted from [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] values derived from differentiation of the [Formula: see text] curve with respect to the frequency f. This approach is similar to the Niblett‐Bostick transform used in magnetotellurics. It not only enhances vertical changes in resistivity but also increases the depth of investigation. Sounding curves can be calculated directly from EM survey data and can be used to generate a resistivity‐depth parasection. Based on such a section, it can be decided whether a Marquardt‐type inversion of the AEM data into a 1-D layered half‐space model is adequate. Each sounding curve can be transformed into an initial step model of resistivity as required for the Marquardt inversion. We have inverted data from sedimentary sequences with good results. For data from a dipping conducting layer and a dipping plate, we have found that the results depend on the right choice of the starting model, in which the number of layers should be large rather than too small. Complex resistivity structures, however, often are represented better by using the sounding‐curve results than with the parameters of a layered half‐space.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Reference26 articles.

1. Interpretation of airborne electromagnetic data using the modified image method

2. Interpretation of airborne electromagnetic data using the modified image method

3. Best, M. E., 1990, Synthetic modeling and airborne electromagnetic interpretation:inFitterman, D. V., Ed., Proceedings of the USGS workshop on developments and applications on modern airborne electromagnetic surveys, 1987, U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull., 1925, 21–32.

4. Duckworth, K., Krebes, E. S., Juigalli, J., Rogozinski, A., and Calvert, H. T., 1993: A coincident‐coil frequency‐domain electromagnetic prospecting system: Can. J. Expl. Geophys.29, 411–418.

5. Inversion of airborne electromagnetic data

Cited by 85 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3