Coherency calculations in the presence of structural dip

Author:

Marfurt Kurt J.1,Sudhaker V.2,Gersztenkorn Adam1,Crawford Kelly D.1,Nissen Susan E.1

Affiliation:

1. AMOCO Expl. & Prod. Technology Group, 4502 East 41st Street, P.O. Box 3385, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74102-3385. Emails:

2. Coherence Technology Corp./Pulsonic, 4343 Second Street NW, Calgary, AB T2KOZ2, Canada.

Abstract

We have used crosscorrelation, semblance, and eigenstructure algorithms to estimate coherency. The first two algorithms calculate coherency over a multiplicity of trial time lags or dips, with the dip having the highest coherency corresponding to the local dip of the reflector. Partially because of its greater computational cost, our original eigenstructure algorithm calculated coherency along an implicitly flat horizon. Although generalizing the eigenstructure algorithm to search over a range of test dips allowed us to image coherency in the presence of steeply dipping structures, we were somewhat surprised that this generalization concomitantly degenerated the quality of the fault images in flatter dip areas. Because it is a local estimation of reflector dip (including as few as five traces), the multidip coherency estimate provides an algorithmically correct, but interpretationally undesirable, estimate of the best apparent dip that explained the offset reflectors across a fault. We ameliorate this problem using two methods, both of which require the smoothing of a locally inaccurate estimate of regional dip. We then calculate our eigenstructure estimate of coherency only along the dip of the reflector, thereby providing maximum lateral resolution of reflector discontinuities. We are thus both better able to explain the superior results obtained by our earliest eigenstructure analysis along interpreted horizon slices, yet able to extend this resolution to steeply dipping reflectors on uninterpreted cubes of seismic data.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Reference11 articles.

1. Bahorich, M. S., and Farmer, S. L., 1995, 3-D seismic coherency for faults and stratigraphic features: The Leading Edge, 1053–1058.

2. 1996, Methods of seismic signal processing and exploration: U.S. Patent 5 563 949.

3. Dalley, R. M., Gevers, E. E. A., Stampli, G. M., Davies, D. J., Gastaldi, C. N., Ruijtenberg, P. R., and Vermeer, G. J. D., 1989, Dip and azimuth displays for 3-D seismic interpretation: First Break,7, 86–95.

4. Gersztenkorn, A., and Marfurt, K. J., 1996a, Coherency computations with eigenstructure: 58th Internat. Mtg., Eur. Assn. Geoscientist and Engineers, Extended Abstracts, x031.

5. 1996b, Eigenstructure based coherence computations: 66th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 328–331.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3