Affiliation:
1. The University of Copenhagen, Solid Earth Physics, Copenhagen, Denmark..
2. Crustal Geophysics and Geochemistry Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Denver, USA..
Abstract
When a geologist sets up a geologic model, various types of disparate information may be available, such as exposures, boreholes, and (or) geophysical data. In recent years, the amount of geophysical data available has been increasing, a trend that is only expected to continue. It is nontrivial (and often, in practice, impossible) for the geologist to take all the details of the geophysical data into account when setting up a geologic model. We have developed an approach that allows for the objective quantification of information from geophysical data and borehole observations in a way that is easy to integrate in the geologic modeling process. This will allow the geologist to make a geologic interpretation that is consistent with the geophysical information at hand. We have determined that automated interpretation of geologic layer boundaries using information from boreholes and geophysical data alone can provide a good geologic layer model, even before manual interpretation has begun. The workflow is implemented on a set of boreholes and airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data from Morrill, Nebraska. From the borehole logs, information about the depth to the base of aquifer (BOA) is extracted and used together with the AEM data to map a surface that represents this geologic contact. Finally, a comparison between our automated approach and a previous manual mapping of the BOA in the region validates the quality of the proposed method and suggests that this workflow will allow a much faster and objective geologic modeling process that is consistent with the available data.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Reference20 articles.
1. Abraham, J. D., J. C. Cannia, P. A. Bedrosian, M. R. Johnson, L. B. Ball, and S. S. Sibray, 2012, Airborne electromagnetic mapping of the base of aquifer in areas of western Nebraska: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5219.
2. Auken, E., S. Chandra, G. Vignoli, A. Shankeel, M. K. Sen, and S. Gupta, 2013, Large scale mapping of groundwater resources in India with results from test sites in different geological terrain: 13th SAGA Biennial Conference & Exhibition October 2013, Conference Contribution.
3. Ball, L. B., H. K. Wade, V. S. Gregory, J. C. Cannia, and M. J. Andersen, 2006, Determination of canal leakage potential using continuous resistivity profiling techniques, interstate and tri-state canals, Western Nebraska and Eastern Wyoming, 2004: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5032.
4. Cannia, J. C., D. Woodward, and L. D. Cast, 2006, Cooperative hydrologic study cohyst, hydrostratigraphic units and aquifer characterization report, http://cohyst.dnr.ne.gov/document/dc012hydro_aquifer_022406.pdf, accessed 2 June 2009.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献