Affiliation:
1. U.S. Geological Survey, Western Earthquake Hazards Team, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 977, Menlo Park, California 94025
Abstract
Using 2-Hz electromagnetic moving‐coil geophones as sensing elements, we have constructed and deployed three‐component seismometers in boreholes at various sites for wave‐propagation studies associated with earthquake hazards (Liu et al., 1991). For example, one such seismometer has been deployed in a 88-m deep borehole reaching bedrock in the Marina District of San Francisco since 1990 (Liu et al., 1992) for the purpose of comparing ground motions in the bedrock and those at the surface. Periodic calibrations for such geophones are necessary to check if the geophone parameters have changed because of decreased magnetization of the geophone ferro‐magnet. For example, the coil transductance of the vertical‐component geophone of the borehole seismometer mentioned above was calibrated to be 121 V-s/m using phase‐ellipse test and step test before deployment. Sixty six months after the deployment, the coil transductance, when calibrated in situ and with a 100-m intervening cable between the geophone and the calibration instrument, was found to be 114 V-s/m.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference7 articles.
1. Asten, M. W., 1977, Theory and practice of geophone calibration in‐situ using a modified step method: Instr. Electr. Electron. Eng. Trans. on Geoscience Electronics, GE-15, 208–214.
2. IMPROVED PHASE-ELLIPSE METHOD FOR IN SITU GEOPHONE CALIBRATION*
3. Nomokonov, V. P., and Ganguli, D. K., 1967, Theory of seismic prospecting instruments: Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献