Affiliation:
1. NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway..
2. NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics, Trondheim, Norway and Tullow Oil plc, Oslo, Norway..
Abstract
Pressure and saturation changes cause a change in seismic P-wave velocity resulting in a shift in 4D traveltime. A discrimination between both effects is important to enhance reservoir management decisions. We explored the possibility of linking the fields of reservoir engineering and 4D seismic. A simple inversion scheme based on a reservoir engineering flow equation for pore pressure predictions combined with the Hertz-Mindlin and Gassmann rock-physics models to discriminate pressure and saturation effects from 4D time shifts was presented. To account for no-flow reservoir boundaries, the pseudo-steady-state flow equation giving the pressure distribution was extended with a superpositioning method. During the inversion, three parameters were determined by a nonlinear, least-squares fitting method: the thickness of the hydrocarbon column, the pressure at the well position, and its decay rate away from the well. We successfully tested our approach on a synthetic and a field data case, where the [Formula: see text] injection well at the Snøhvit field, Norway, served as a good example to demonstrate our method. We observed a good correlation between simulation and inversion in our synthetic study. Our theory was limited to homogeneous reservoir conditions and produces spatially low frequent outputs. To apply the model in complex fields, such as at Snøhvit, we introduced a spatially varying Mindlin-exponent over the field and used the theory as an heuristic model assuming that a variation of the Mindlin-exponent takes a change in pressure sensitivity into account. This assumption provided the possibility to indirectly include heterogeneities in grain sorting and porosity variation and improved the model significantly. We see the advantage of our method in its fast and direct implementation to study first-order effects of pressure and saturation behavior on time-lapse seismic data using a simple inversion algorithm instead of computationally intensive simulations.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference37 articles.
1. Avseth, P. A., N. Skjei, and G. Mavko, 2012, Rock physics modelling of stress sensitivity in patchy cemented sandstones: 74th Annual International Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, I009.
2. Bakulin, A., N. Drinkwater, C. Signer, S. Ryan, and A. O’Dovovan, 2000, Combining 4D seismic and reservoir simulation key to effective reservoir management: 61st Annual International Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, B31.
3. Inverse problem in hydrogeology
4. Dadashpour, M., 2009, Reservoir characterization using production data and time-lapse seismic data: Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
5. Vp ∕ Vs ratio versus differential stress and rock consolidation — A comparison between rock models and time-lapse AVO data
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献