Are bright spots always hydrocarbons? A case study in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand

Abstract

In the shallower regions of the 3D Nimitz seismic survey, there exist multiple interesting bright seismic amplitude anomalies. These anomalies, or funny looking things, occur in a confined spatial and temporal region of the seismic. They have a concave-up seismic appearance along the cross section. Bright seismic amplitudes can be a direct hydrocarbon indicator, or they can be representative of strong lithologic contrasts and/or acquisition artifacts. We have set out to investigate misinterpreted seismic anomalies along cross-sectional lines. Therefore, we apply seismic attributes to indicate that these bright spot features, which we interpret to be submarine gullies looking along time-slice intersections, can possibly be mistaken for hydrocarbon anomalies in a cross-sectional view. However, we cannot fully rule out the presence of hydrocarbons because it is common for gas sands to create similar anomalies. Previously drilled wells within the survey (Korimako-1 and Tarapunga-1) point to a lack of hydrocarbon potential in the subsurface. Although it is possible that these bright spots are due to hydrocarbon presence, we develop a more likely hypothesis: The lithology of the interfluve sediments is similar to the gully-margin drapes but differs from the gully sediment fill. Funny looking thing (FLT): Submarine gullies Seismic appearance: High-amplitude spotted features Alternative interpretations: Lithologic anomalies, gas seeps, bright spots Features with a similar appearance: Gas accumulation, sediment fills in limestone paleocaves Formation: Giant Foresets Formation Age: Pleistocene Location: Taranaki Basin, New Zealand Seismic data: Nimitz 3D (cropped volume) Analysis tools: Curvature, instantaneous frequency, and sweetness attributes; well reports