Affiliation:
1. Faculdades Integradas Einstein de Limeira
2. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
Abstract
Objective: to assess the satisfaction of the person with urinary retention in the face of the use of different types of urinary catheters, as well as to compare and analyze different attributes of these after their use in clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Method: descriptive exploratory cross-sectional study, developed in a reference clinic in the state of São Paulo, from February to March 2020. The sample consisted of 32 adults registered in the service, and who adopted the CIC as a form of bladder emptying . Data collection was performed through individual interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive, inferential statistics and categorization of responses to open questions. Results: of the 32 users, 84% were male, with a mean age of 54.16 years, 81% performed the procedure between 1 and 5 years, with a frequency of 4 to 6 times a day (66%). Most respondents (73%) preferred the hydrophilic-coated polyurethane catheter, converging with the percentage of users satisfied with the same catheter. Conclusion: the most satisfying technology is the hydrophiliccoated polyurethane catheter due to several attributes such as lubrication, firmness, packaging, urethral slip, handling, rapid urine clearance and comfort
Publisher
SOBEST Associacao Brasileira de Estomaterapia
Reference22 articles.
1. Assis GM, Faro ACM. Autocateterismo vesical intermitente na lesão medular. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011;45(1):289–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342011000100041
2. Kennelly M, Thiruchelvam N, Averbeck MA, Konstatinidis C, Chartier-Kastler E, Trøjgaard P et al. Adult Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction and Intermittent Catheterisation in a Community Setting: Risk Factors Model for Urinary Tract Infections. AdvUrol. 2019:1−13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2757862
3. Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses. BMC Urol. 2017;17:4. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0191-1
4. Truzzi JC, Teich V, Pepe C. Cateteres com revestimento hidrofilico podem ser beneficos para o sistema público de saúde no Brasil? Uma análise de custo-efetividade em pacientes com lesão da medula espinhal. IBJU Int braz J urol. 2017;43. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0221
5. Assis GM, Fraga R. Cateterismo intermitente limpo: manual ilustrado de orientação ao usuário (adulto). Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná − Hospital de Clínicas, 2015. Available at: https://quemcuida.com.br/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/manual-cateterismo-vidas-secas.pdf