Legal approaches to combating massacres in russia

Author:

Chechel GrigoryORCID,Artamonova Elena,Tretyak Maria,Gontar Sergei

Abstract

Objective: In recent decades, the number of mass shootings in Russian educational institutions has increased. The study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of various means of protecting an individual developed and implemented in the country. Within this objective, the authors discuss the possibility of using preventive measures against grave crimes, i.e. the death penalty enshrined in the current criminal law but not fully implemented due to the moratorium. In the emerging Russian judicial practice, the authors consider crimes committed by minors and persons between the age of 18 and 21.   Methods: As part of the study, the authors review scientific works on the topic, crime statistics, and decisions of legislative authorities.   Results: According to the newly developed and consolidated provisions of Russian legislation, there has been a tightening of responsibility for arms trafficking in the form of a complete ban on the acquisition of any firearms by the named persons. It has been established that the main reason for the rapid increase in massacres is not the tightening or leniency of the law but its non-compliance. In the cases under consideration, civilian firearms were acquired by young people illegally due to neglect of one’s professional duties.   Conclusion: The authors believe that the measures, consisting in toughening the responsibility for the illegal circulation of civilian weapons adopted in 2021, will be more effective in preventing massacres among persons under the age of 21. As for the ability of such measures to counteract grave crimes committed by persons who have already reached this age, there are great doubts about their effectiveness. In this regard, there is a need to improve the newly adopted measures to prevent grave crimes among young people depending on their age (under or over 21).

Publisher

South Florida Publishing LLC

Subject

Law,Development,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Reference23 articles.

1. Agnich, L.E. (2015). A comparative analysis of attempted and completed school-based mass murder attacks. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9239-5

2. Artamonova, E.A. (2019). Voleizyavlenie obvinyaemogo (podozrevaemogo) kak ugolovno-protsessualnaya kategoriya [The will of the accused (suspect) as a criminal procedural category]. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal, 13(6), 1025-1034. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(6).1025-1034

3. Artamonova, E.A., & Tretyak, M.I. (2022). Massovoe vooruzhennoe ubiistvo v uchebnykh organizatsiyakh: Vozmozhnosti protivodeistviya ugolovno-pravovymi sredstvami [Mass shootings in educational organizations: Opportunities to counteract criminal and legal means]. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal, 16(2), 229-239.

4. Bondarenko, M. (2021, May 13). Zolotov predlozhil mery po uzhestocheniyu pravil obrashcheniya s oruzhiem [Zolotov proposed measures to tighten the rules for handling weapons]. RBK. Retrieved August 22, 2021 from https://www.rbc.ru/society/13/05/2021/609d17499a79477f032e1071

5. Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. (2009). Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 19 noyabrya 2009 g. No. 1344-O-R “O razyasnenii p. 5 rezolyutivnoi chasti Postanovleniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 2 fevralya 1999 g. No. 3-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii st. 41 i ch. 3 st. 42 Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa RSFSR, punktov 1 i 2 Postanovleniya Verkhovnogo Soveta RF ot 16 iyulya 1993 g. “O poryadke vvedeniya v deistvie Zakona RF “O vnesenii izmenenii i dopolnenii v Zakon RSFSR “O sudoustroistve RSFSR”, Ugolovno-protsessualnyi kodeks RSFSR, Ugolovnyi kodeks RSFSR i Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh” [Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of November 19, 2009 No. 1344-O-P “On clarification of Clause 5 of the operative part of Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of February 2, 1999 No. 3-P in the case of checking the constitutionality of Article 41 and Clause 3 of Article 42 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR, Clauses 1 and 2 of Resolution of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation of July 16, 1993 “On the procedure for enacting the Law of the Russian Federation “On introducing amendments and additions to the Law of the RSFSR “On the judiciary of the RSFSR”, the Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR, the Criminal Code of the RSFSR and the Code of the RSFSR on Administrative Offenses]. Retrieved January 6, 2023 from http://doc.ksrf.ru/decision/KSRFDecision24593.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3