Rupioid psoriasis: A complex, multifactorial presentation
-
Published:2023-07-25
Issue:2
Volume:5
Page:1-5
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Journal of Case Reports and Images in Pediatrics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Case Rep Images Pediatr
Author:
Ward Caroline1, Ravichandran Sairekha2, Chen Wei-Shen3, Albers Sharon3
Affiliation:
1. Medical Student, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr., Tampa, FL, USA 2. Resident, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of South Florida, 17 Davis Blvd, Tampa, FL, USA 3. Faculty, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of South Florida, 17 Davis Blvd, Tampa, FL, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Secondary syphilis, also termed the great mimicker due to its vast array of clinical presentations, is associated with skin manifestations including rupioid, macular, psoriasiform, and condylomatous lesions. On clinical examination alone, it can be difficult to differentiate between rupioid syphilis and rupioid psoriasis, especially among cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis co-infection; however, histologic examination can aid in their differentiation. Additional testing such as serum rapid plasma reagin (RPR), anti-HIV antibody, rheumatoid factor, and fungal cultures should be performed to exclude other causes of rupioid lesions.
Case Report: A 19-year-old HIV-positive male developed numerous hyperkeratotic skin lesions involving the head, trunk, and extremities over a 4-week period. His RPR was positive (1:64), suggesting a diagnosis of rupioid syphilis. The patient was treated with doxycycline, given a reported history of penicillin allergy. Rapid plasma reagin titers decreased to 1:2 following treatment; however, the skin eruption did not improve. A biopsy of a lesion demonstrated psoriasiform acanthosis with confluent hyperkeratosis, clusters of intracorneal neutrophils, and negative spirochete immunostaining. Based on histopathology and clinical presentation, a diagnosis of rupioid psoriasis was favored. The patient was started on targeted anti-psoriatic therapy with apremilast and maintains close follow-up with his dermatologist every three months.
Conclusion: Although the patient’s presentation was initially presumed to be secondary to syphilis, his lack of response to treatment prompted further workup to assess the etiology of the patient’s skin findings more accurately. In doing so, a diagnosis of rupioid psoriasis was favored based on the histologic findings observed.
Publisher
Edorium Journals Pvt. Ltd.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Medicine,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development,General Medicine,General Engineering,General Medicine,Applied Mathematics,General Medicine
Reference6 articles.
1. Armstrong AW, Read C. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of psoriasis: A review. JAMA 2020;323(19):1945–60. 2. Ip KHK, Cheng HS, Oliver FG. Rupioid psoriasis. JAMA Dermatol 2021;157(7):859. 3. Steele CE, Anderson M, Miedema J, Culton D. Rupioid psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a patient with skin of color. Cutis 2020;106(1):E2–4. 4. Yu T, Che J, Song J, Duan X, Yang J. Annular rupioid secondary syphilis confined to the face. Int J Infect Dis 2022;122:644–6. 5. Krase IZ, Cavanaugh K, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. A case of rupioid syphilis. JAAD Case Rep 2016;2(2):141–3.
|
|