A retrospective review of the potential relationship between the TMT B and on-road driving performance within a community rehabilitation setting

Author:

Hinckley Andrea1,Patterson Sarah1,Matigian Nicolas2

Affiliation:

1. Rehab@Home, Queensland Health, Metro South Health, Logan Central Community Health Centre, 97-103 Wembley Road, Logan Central, QLD 4114, Australia

2. Queensland Cyber Infrastructure Foundation Ltd (QCIF), Level 5 Axon Building, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia

Abstract

Aims: Occupational therapy (OT) driving assessments provide the gold standard approach to determine fitness to drive post-injury, medical event, and aging. However, these assessments are time intensive, costly and are associated with lengthy waitlists. As such, there is interest to investigate innovative approaches, including the use of the Trails Making Test B (TMT B), to assist clinicians with their decisions around returning to driving. The aim of this research was to explore potential correlations between TMT B scores and driving assessment outcomes. Methods: Trails Making Test B data were collected between 2010 and 2019 within a publicly funded community-based driving service in Brisbane, which serviced a wide range of client diagnostic groups and age ranges (17–94 years). A retrospective analysis was completed to compare with the on-road OT driving assessment outcome. Results: Results indicate a statistically significant relationship between TMT B score with on-road driving performance, with a higher confidence of predictability in the younger age groups (defined as 63 years or younger). Age is also related to on-road performance, with older clients more likely to fail. A 120 second time cut off may be a clinically relevant marker in predicting on-road performance, particularly for the younger clients. Conclusion: The TMT B is useful tool to assist in the decision making around returning to driving to aid in the timing and need of on-road driving assessment and to potentially assist with decision making in situations where these assessments are not practically available. Clinicians can consider the risk versus the benefits of the test as a predictive tool given their specific contextual environment and access to on-road driving assessments.

Publisher

Edorium Journals Pvt. Ltd.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3