Abstract
This article comparatively analyzes the manifestations and various factors of political populism in the European post-transitional periphery. The main difficulty in mapping political populism in the European post-transitional periphery and defining populist parties most accurately is that, unlike most political forces in developed democracies, such parties do not belong to traditional parties. Moreover, their ideology combines the positions of both right and left parties, which makes it extremely difficult to place them on the classical right-left scale of the party spectrum.
The political agenda of the populist parties of the European post-transition peripheral countries has a different content, but it usually comes down to updating issues that are hushed up by the political establishment: protecting national and cultural identity, taking tough measures aimed at combating corruption and crime, protecting traditional family values, and even harsh criticism of the Council of Europe, the OSCE and the EU and their institutions. A distinctive feature of the populist forces was also that in their majority they called for the protection of the rights and interests of ordinary people and the wider use of the instruments of direct democracy, and thus directly opposed one of the fundamental principles of liberal democracy, taking into account the opinion of the minority.
The article analyzes the emergence of a populist environment, where the responsibility, trust and dignity of politicians are distorted, which in turn leads to a crisis of understanding and civiliarchic culture. The influence of populist parties has grown and most European post-transitional peripheral countries have at least one successful populist party, and populists are among the most influential parties. It is noteworthy that civil society organizations have identified the activities of populist leaders and their parties as the main threat facing the Eastern Partnership countries. Using populist technologies, mainly in the context of an election campaign, leaders and their political groups seek to manipulate public opinion and change the alignment of political parties in the European post-transitional periphery.
Reference39 articles.
1. Albertazzi, Daniele, Bonansinga, Donatella, and Davide Vampa. 2021. “Introduction.” In: Populism and new patterns of political competition in Western Europe, edited by Daniele Albertazzi and Davide Vampa, 1-18. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
2. Arato, Andrew, and Jean L. Cohen. 2021. Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. Oxford University Press.
3. Arditi, Benjamin. 2005. “Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics.” In: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by Francisco Panizza, 72-98. New York, London: Verso.
4. Berend, Ivan T. 2020. The Economics and Politics of European Integration: Populism, Nationalism and the History of the EU. London and New York: Routledge.
5. Breyfogle, Nicholas B., Schrader, Abby, and Willard Sunderland. 2007. “Russian colonizations: an introduction.” In: Peopling the Russian periphery: borderland colonization in Eurasian history, edited by Nicholas B. Breyfogle, Abby Schrader and Willard Sunderland, 1-18. London and New York: Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献