Abstract
This article analyzes the strategy of self-exclusion in the foreign policy of small states, considering their goals and expected results of this strategy, that is, the main conditions for its implementation, the main determinants, and also identifies and characterizes its varieties and practical manifestations. In this context, global transformations also cause changes related to the positions and roles of small states in world politics and international relations. At the same time, global transformations change the understanding of the security of small states, which in turn leads to an increase in the number of studies in this area. Together, these factors become the rationale for the relevance of studying the security problems of small states in modern conditions. In conclusion, the results of the analysis are summarized, the features of the strategy of self-exclusion, common features and differences in its varieties are shown.
Reference34 articles.
1. Beyer, Jessica L., and Stephanie C. Hofmann. 2011. “Varieties of neutrality.” Cooperation and Conflict 46 (3): 285-311, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836711416956.
2. Black, Cyril E. et al. 1968. Neutralization and World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Choi, Insu. 1995. Small states and the balance of power. Monterey. Naval Postgraduate School. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/31415.
4. Dahl, Ann-Sofie. 1997. “To Be or Not to Be Neutral: Swedish Security Strategy in the Post-Cold War Era.” In: The National Security of Small States in a Changing World, edited by Efraim Inbar and Gabriel Sheffer, 175-196. London: Routledge.
5. Domingo, Francis. 2014. “The RMA Theory and Small States.” Military and Strategic Affairs 6(3): 43-58.