Fetal distress and the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA): A meta-analysis

Author:

Liu Yongli,Chi Xiuping,Qiang Zhe

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the effect of malondialdehyde (MDA) level on fetal distress. Methods: Meta-analyses of randomized controlled interventions were performed by searching 8 electronic databases (CNKI, VIP, CBM, WANFANG,  Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from 1980 – to date for randomized controlled trials to determine any intrapartum fetal distress. A  metaanalysis within a frequentist framework was performed and the quality and inconsistency of the trials were assessed. Dual selection and data  abstraction were conducted. The methodological quality of the meta-analyses was assessed using AMSTAR, and the quality of evidence was assessed  using GRADE. Random-effect models were used to pool results from individual studies included in each meta-analysis. Results: A total of 1720 patients received MDA tests, and the results showed that MDA value of experimental group was 1.66 higher than that of control  group. Heterogeneity between the two groups was high, suggesting that the choice of blood source significantly affected the result of meta-analysis (p <  0.05). The group of blood samples collected from mothers was highly heterogeneous, and combined with the results of 16 groups, the effective amount  reached (2.08) was significant (z = 4.29, p < 0.05). This means that MDA increase in maternal blood during maternal-fetal distress. Secondly, cord blood samples were highly heterogeneous in the collection group, and the random effect was insignificant (z = 0.94, p > 0.05). Conclusion: Malondialdehyde level in maternal and cord blood reflects the relationship between fetal distress and adverse outcomes. Further research is  needed to confirm the extent to which they are related. 

Publisher

African Journals Online (AJOL)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmaceutical Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3