Best management practices for coastal inlets
Author:
Elko Nicole1, McKenna Kimberley2, Roberts Briggs Tiffany3, Brown Nicholas3, Walther Michael4, York Dawn5
Affiliation:
1. ASBPA 2. Stockton University Coastal Research Center 3. Florida Atlantic University 4. Coastal Tech–G.E.C. Inc. 5. Moffatt & Nichol
Abstract
Coastal inlets separate individual barrier islands or barrier spits and adjacent headlands (Hayes and Fitzgerald 2013). Inlets modify longshore transport and store sediment in flood and ebb shoals leading to dynamic adjacent shorelines. For example, 80% to 85% of the beach erosion in Florida can be attributed to inlets (Dean 1991). In some cases, structured inlets are designed to trap sand in a preferred location to minimize interference with navigation and facilitate its removal through dredging. Sound coastal engineering practice requires that this sand be placed on adjacent eroding beaches (NRC 1995) to protect coastal resources. This paper provides a brief overview of coastal inlet management and identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) intended to balance human needs for inlet navigation with the natural systems adjacent to tidal inlets. Today’s conservation measures, which are a result of considerable monitoring, numerical modeling, and other science-based methods, demonstrate that BMPs improve management of sand resources and reduce impacts associated with tidal inlet dredging. For some inlet conditions, BMPs include use of inlet sediment sinks as cost-effective and eco-friendly sand sources for beach nourishment projects located close to the inlet. For optimal coastal inlet management, the ASBPA Science and Technology Committee recommends the following BMPs and conservation measures:
• Limit frequency and duration of impacts,
• Follow environmental windows,
• Implement regional sediment management,
• Use beach-compatible sand,
• Conduct pre-, during-, and post-dredging monitoring,
• Modify dredging equipment/practices, and
• Design rechargeable, low-impact inlet borrow sites.
Publisher
American Shore and Beach Preservation Association
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference49 articles.
1. Beck, T. M., 2019. “Review of Coastal Tidal Inlet Morphodynamics in the Context of Barrier-Inlet Sustainability.” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center report, ERDC/CHL SR-19-6, August 2019, 61. 2. Bergquist, D. C., 2008. “Change and recovery of physical and biological characteristics at beach and borrow areas impacted by the 2005 Folly Beach renourishment project.” South Carolina State Documents Depository. 3. Bridges, T. S., Wagner, P.W., Burks-Copes, K. A., Bates, M. E., Collier, Z. A., Fischenich, J. C., Gailiani, J,, Leuck, L., Piercy, C. D., and J. D. Rosati, 2015. “Use of natural and nature-based features (NNBF) for coastal resilience.” US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, ERDC SR-15-1, 479. 4. Bridges, T. S., Gustavson, K. E., Schroeder, P., Ells, S. J., Hayes, D., Nadeau, S. C., Palermo, M.R., and C. Patmont, 2010. “Dredging processes and remedy effectiveness: Relationship to the 4 Rs of environmental dredging.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 6(4), 619-630. 5. Bruun, P., and F. Gerritsen. 1959. “Natural bypassing of sand at coastal inlets.” Journal of the Waterways and Harbors Division, ASCE, 85(4), 75-107.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|