Affiliation:
1. Coastal Science & Engineering
Abstract
The City of Myrtle Beach (South Carolina, USA) initiated a three-phase plan for beach restoration in the 1980s: Phase 1 — small-scale beach scraping; Phase 2 — mediumscale nourishment by trucks using inland sand; and Phase 3 — large-scale nourishment by dredge using offshore sand. Phases 1 and 2 were locally funded and served as interim measures (1981-1996) until a 50-year federal project could be constructed (1997 to present). In the course of this work, the city pioneered several approaches to beach management and became a model for the state. These include: the prototype SC beach survey program; the profile volume method for determining shorelines in the presence of seawalls, which was codified in the Beach Management Act (BMA) of 1988; the first locally funded nourishment (1986-1987) and FEMA-funded postdisaster renourishment after Hurricane Hugo 1989-1990; and the first surveys of offshore deposits for nourishment. Before restoration, nearly 65% of the 9-mile (14.5 kilometer) oceanfront was armored with seawalls, bulkheads, and revetments (1981). After nourishment, erosion control structures are now buried and fronted by a vegetated storm berm, while a wider beach accommodates millions of visitors each year. Total volumes and adjusted costs of nourishment from 1986 to early 2018 are 4,997,201 cubic yards (3,820,360 m3) and ~$70.8 million ($2018), respectively. On a unit annual beach length basis, the cost of beach restoration and improvement has averaged $46.80 per one foot of shoreline per year (~$153.50/m/yr) ($2018). Oceanfront property values on a unit length of shoreline basis presently range from ~$15,000/ft (~$49,200/m) for single-family homes to ~$75,000/ft (~$250,000/m) for high-rise buildings, suggesting that beach maintenance has cost well under 0.5% of oceanfront property values per year. Sand loss rates have averaged ~0.8 cy/ft/yr (2.0 m3/m/yr), and the rate of nourishment has been more than adequate to keep up with the ~0.37 ft (0.11 m) sea level rise between 1980 and 2018.
Publisher
American Shore and Beach Preservation Association
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference50 articles.
1. Barnhardt, W.A., J.J. Denny, W.E. Baldwin, W.C. Schwab, R.A. Morton, P.T. Gayes, and N.W. Driscoll, 2007. “Geologic framework of the Long Bay inner shelf: implications for coastal evolution in South Carolina.” In Proc. Coastal Sediments ‘07, ASCE, New York, NY, 2151-2163.
2. Barrineau, P., R. Janmaat, and T. Kana, 2019. “Comparing empirical depths of closure along the U.S. East Coast.” In Proc. Coastal Sediments ’19. World Scientific (e-book). 2103–2116.
3. Bruun, P., 1962. “Sea-level rise as a cause of shore erosion.” Jour. Waterways and Harbor Div, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 88(WW1), 117-132.
4. CERC, 1984. Shore Protection Manual. 4th Edition, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Ft Belvoir, VA; U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 2 vols.
5. CSE, 1993. Updated estimate of beach nourishment requirements for North Myrtle Beach. Final Report for City of North Myrtle Beach. CSE, Columbia, S.C., 67 pp + appendices.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. An ASBPA White Paper: U.S. community perspectives on coastal flooding;Shore & Beach;2022-08-31
2. Developed Coasts;Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences;2021