Complex Interdisciplinary Approach to Modelling Information Literacy Education

Author:

Koltay TiborORCID,Szőke-Milinte EnikőORCID

Abstract

Purpose/Thesis: This paper identifies the most important theoretical issues and frameworks that may serve as a basis for models of teaching information literacy.Approach/Methods: The paper reviews relevant subject literature published between 1990s and the present to outline the disciplinary context of information literacy in order to identify concepts that might be used to model teaching of information literacy.Results and conclusions: In the light of convergences and overlaps between different literacies, this paper considers various pedagogic approaches – phenomenographic, sociocultural, and discourse analytical, to combine them with the cognitive approach to information literacy. The literature review shows that all these approaches might contribute to a theoretical foundation of information literacy across different age groups and on different levels of education.Originality/Value: Teaching information literacy is examined from a cross-disciplinary perspective with a focus on information science and pedagogy.

Publisher

Polish Librarians' Association

Reference55 articles.

1. AASL. (1998). Information Power. Building Partnership for Learning. American Association of School Librarians, Association for Educational Communications Technology, Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

2. Aharony, N., Limberg, L., Julien, H., Albright, K., Fourie, I., Bronstein, J. (2017). Information Literacy in an Era of Information Uncertainty. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 528–531, https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401063

3. ALISE. (2016). ALISE Research Taxonomy [online]. Association for Library and Information Science Education [26.09.2020], https://www.alise.org/research-taxonomy

4. Bawden, D. (2015). On Not Being a Weak Discipline [online]. The Occasional Informationist [14.09.2020], https://theoccasionalinformationist.com/2015/07/06/on-not-being-a-weak-discipline/

5. Bawden, D., Robinson, L. (2009). The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and Other Paradoxes and Pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191, https://doi. org/10.1177/0165551508095781

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3