How do early career researchers perceive success in their fields? – report on interviews with humanists, theologians and scientists-artists in Poland

Author:

Świgoń MarzenaORCID

Abstract

Purpose: This paper presents the Polish researchers’ opinions on success perception in science and examines the role of bibliometric and altmetric indices/metrics. It also provides respondents’ statements on how their work is evaluated at Polish universities.Methods: The data come from in-depth interviews (spring 2023) with early career researchers in Linguistics, Literary Studies, History, Philosophy, Polish studies, Theology, Arts, Music, Plastic/Fine Arts, and Film.Results: The respondents’ attachment to indices used in the periodical evaluation of scholars at Polish universities, such as the number of publications, ministerial score points, and external grants, was observed. The respondents were critical of citations as the determinant of success. They were generally not very interested in altmetrics.Value: The importance of this research (National Science Centre grant No 2022/45/B/HS2/00041), which is the Polish continuation of the two international projects (2016–2022), lies mainly in providing a platform to researchers in art and humanities, not included in earlier studies devoted to the sciences and social sciences.

Publisher

Polish Librarians' Association

Reference22 articles.

1. Agarwal, Ashok; Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi; Tatagari, Sindhuja; Esteves, Sandro D.; Harlev, Avi; Henkel, Ralf; Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep; Homa, Sheryl; Garrido-Puchalt, Nicolás; Ramasamy, Ranjith; Majzoub, Ahmad; Dao-Ly, Kim; Tvrda, Eva; Assidi, Mourad; Kesari, Kavindra; Sharma, Reecha; Banihani, Saleem; Ko, Edmund; Abu-Elmagd, Muhammad; Gosálvez, Jaime; Bashiri, Asher (2016). Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(2), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582

2. Andersen, Heine (2000). Influence and reputation in the social sciences – how much do researchers agree? Journal of documentation, 56(6), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007132

3. Blackmore, Paul (2016). Why research trumps teaching and what can be done about it. In: Blackmore, Paul; Blackwell, Richard; Edmondson, Martin (Eds.). Tackling wicked issues: Prestige and employment outcomes in the teaching excellence framework. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Hepi_TTWI-Web.pdf

4. Borchardt, Rachel; Moran, Cullen; Cantrill, Stuart; See-Arr Oh, Chemjobber; Hartings, Matthew R. (2018). Perception of the importance of chemistry research papers and comparison to citation rates. PloS one, 13(3), e0194903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194903

5. Bornmann, Lutz; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3