Poor Adherence to Indications for Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Testing in a South African Tertiary Hospital

Author:

Govender Ramona,Hodkinson Bridget

Abstract

Appropriate use of laboratory investigations is increasingly important in resource-constrained environments. In this study, we reviewed the anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing practices in a tertiary hospital in South Africa. A retrospective file review was conducted, encompassing all ANCA tests ordered over 12 months, including both inpatients and outpatients. Sociodemographic and clinical details were extracted from the patient records. All requests were assessed against the International Consensus Statement of 1999, which provides clinical guidelines for the indications for ANCA testing. Of the 945 ANCA tests requested, 790 patient records were reviewed, while 155 records were found to be missing, and 62 patients had multiple tests. Only 193 patients (24.4%) had indications for ANCA testing that met the guidelines. The most common tests done outside guideline indications were critical limb ischemia (9.6%), stroke (7.3%), uveitis (5.7%), renal impairment (4.9%), and interstitial lung disease (4.4%). Among the patients, ten (1.3%) were diagnosed with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), of whom nine had renal-limited vasculitis. Twenty-six patients tested positive for ANCA without any evidence of AAV. Of these false positives, 10 (38.4%) were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, 3 (11.5%) had tuberculosis (TB), and 3 (11.5%) had other autoimmune diseases. The annual cost of ANCA tests amounted to ZAR274,046, with ZAR17,490 spent on duplicate testing and ZAR208,275 on non-indicated clinical conditions. The study revealed that ANCA testing was performed outside standard guidelines in three-quarters of requests, and duplicate testing was common, resulting in large cost implications. Chronic infections, such as HIV and TB, and autoimmune conditions accounted for half of the false-positive tests. The findings suggest that training of clinicians is likely to reduce unnecessary tests.

Publisher

AccScience Publishing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3