<b>The Role of Consultation Services for Clinical Study Participants: a Survey of Progress on the Five Year Activation Plan for Clinical Study/Trial 2012 </b>-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Role of Consultation Services for Clinical Study Participants: a Survey of Progress on the Five Year Activation Plan for Clinical Study/Trial 2012

Published:2018-05-31 Issue:3 Volume:49 Page:127-134
ISSN:0388-1601
Container-title:Rinsho yakuri/Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
language:en
Short-container-title:Jpn. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.

Author:

HATTORI Sawako¹,AIZAWA Kuniko¹,YAMAMOTO Haruko²,TASHIRO Shimon³,MATSUI Kenji¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Research Ethics and Bioethics, National Cerebral & Cardiovascular Center

2. Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Sciences, National Cerebral & Cardiovascular Center

3. Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center

Publisher

Japanese Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jscpt/49/3/49_127/_pdf

Reference5 articles.

1. 10) Easa D, Norris K, Hammatt Z, Kim K, Hernandez E, Kato K, et al. The research subject advocate at minority Clinical Research Centers: an added resource for protection of human subjects. Ethn Dis. 2005; 15 (4 Suppl 5) : S5-107-10.

2. 11) Easa D, Kim K, Kato K, Ho T, Balaraman V, Medina L, et al. The research subject advocate at the University of Hawai'i Clinical Research Center: an added resource for protection of human subjects. Hawaii Med J. 2006; 65 (2) : 50-2.

3. 12) Kost RG, Reider C, Stephens J, Schuff KG. Research subject advocacy:program implementation and evaluation at clinical and translational science award centers. Acad Med. 2012; 87 (9) : 1228-36. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628afa.

4. 13) Department of Public Health, New York Weill Cornell Medical Center. Focus. 2004; Summer 2004: 4. ［http://hpr.weill.cornell.edu/about_us/pdf/focus_summer_2004.pdf］

5. 14) Underhill K. Legal and ethical values in the resolution of research-related disputes: how can IRBs respond to participant complaints?. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014; 9 (1) : 71-82. doi: 10.1525/jer.2014.9.1.71.