Author:
Burt Marie Claire,Parwani Karuna,Ramos Nancy,Peroni Victoria,Pane Juan Carlos,Burt Martin
Abstract
Participatory initiatives in local governance, such as participatory budgeting and local assemblies, aim to involve communities at various levels of a development project. A key challenge remains in equipping government officials with tools to effectively understand and address community needs. This paper examines the efficacy of the Poverty Stoplight (Stoplight or PS), a participatory tool, in addressing this gap. This tool enables communities to self-assess their poverty status, identifying themselves as "red", "yellow", or "green" based on a range of indicators. Emphasizing self-assessment and mentoring, the Stoplight approach fosters community ownership and agency. This ensures members play a pivotal role in highlighting their needs and forming their development aspirations. This research adopts a case study approach, detailing experiences with the Poverty Stoplight across diverse contexts, such as in Paraguay and Ecuador. Results indicate that the Stoplight not only facilitates individual poverty elimination strategies but also promotes collective participation within local governmental structures.
Publisher
Red de Investigadores Latinoamericanos
Reference49 articles.
1. Alsop, R. (2005). Power, rights and poverty: Concepts and connections. World Bank.
2. Arnstein, S. (1969). Ladder of Citizen Participation. (35th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 216–224). Journal of the American Institute of Planners.
3. Batliwala, S. (2007). Taking the power out of empowerment–an experiential account. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 557–565.
4. Batliwala, S. (2019). All About Power: Understanding Social Power & Power Structures. Namati.
5. Bhaskar, L. (2008). Elected Women Representatives: Participation and Decision-making, in: Ganesamurthy, V.S. (Ed.), Empowerment of Women in India: Social, Economic, Political. New Century Publications, Singhal, pp. 83–93.