Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on Coronal Microleakage in Endodontically Treated Teeth (An in vitro Study)

Author:

Alikhani Armaghan,Mohammadi Mahnoosh,Etemadi Najme,Azarang Seyed Alireza Moosavi

Abstract

Background: The coronal microleakage in the endodontically treated teeth causes recurrent caries and can be associated with the restoration and the root canal treatment failures. Intra orifice barrier is an efficient alternative method to decrease coronal leakage in endodotically treated teeth and one of the best barriers is glass ionomer. The current study propose that using different irrigation solutions in root canals effect on coronal microleakage. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the coronal microleakage in glass ionomer obturated root canals in endodontically treated teeth using different irrigation solutions. Methods: Sixty extracted human single-rooted teeth with single canals were collected and disinfected with 0.5 choloro amin. After root canal therapy and evacuation of 2 mm coronal gutta percha, the teeth were divided into 3 groups of each 20, based on irrigation solutions. Glass ionomer was used as the coronal barrier and the teeth were stored in distilled water.  The irrigation solutions used were: 17% EDTA, Alcohol and normal saline. Then all the specimen were submerged in 2% methylene blue dye for 24 hours at room temperature and sectioned sagittally and the dye penetration was assessed by stereomicroscope. Results: There were not penetration of dye only in 3.3% of teeth and all of the teeth that irrigated with saline showed dye penetration. The dye penetration was seen in 95%, 95% and 100% of the EDTA, alcohol and saline groups, respectively. Dye penetration was higher in Saline group than other two groups but coronal microleakage has not shown statistically significant differences in different groups. Conclusion: The results of current study indicated that using different irrigation solutions may be associated with decrease in coronal microleakage. Although, based on our findings there are not any significant differences among different irrigation solutions but more studies may be needed to confirm this results.

Publisher

Sciencedomain International

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3