Lower Incisor Positions in Different Malocclusions and Facial Pattern
-
Published:2021-11-23
Issue:
Volume:
Page:298-304
-
ISSN:2456-9119
-
Container-title:Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:JPRI
Author:
Jabbar Abdul,Saba .,Lal Ramesh,Farooq Amber,Bashir Uzma,Hussain Nadeem
Abstract
Aims: The position of lower incisor has been of significant concern when seeking orthodontic treatment plan, it has been recognized as one of diagnostic key and play an important in the development of normal occlusion and facial pattern. This study was aimed at the determination of lower incisor position and its possible association with different sagittal malocclusions and facial patterns.
Study Design: Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthodontics Institute of Dentistry Liaquat University Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS) Jamshoro between June 2019 to July 2020.
Methodology: Ninety-seven pre-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographies were taken, and they were classified sagittally into skeletal class I, II and III, and vertically into normodivergent, hyperdivergent and hypodivergent facial pattern using ANB and SNMP, respectively. Lower incisor position was assessed by means of FMIA and IMPA. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to check any association between lower incisor position and sagittal malocclusion and facial pattern. P value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The study sample consisted of 97 patients. The mean age of the patients was 25.55 SD ±3.93. The mean SNMP value was 28.84 SD ±7.354 and mean ANB value 4.809 SD ±3.85. Mean Incisor position based on IMPA was 98.598 SD ± 9.413 and FMIA 54 SD ±9.995. Intra and interobserver reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging between 0.825 and 0.990 respectively. The ANOVA test results showed significant relationship between the sagittal malocclusion and incisor position with P value .036. The Bonferroni analysis indicated that statistically significant association existed in term of lower incisor position between Class II and Class III malocclusion with P value .047. Test results further indicated that there is no significant difference in the position of lower incisor in relation to facial pattern with P value .355.
Conclusions: Statistically significant association was found between lower incisor position with respect to the sagittal malocclusion. However, no significant association was found between facial pattern and lower incisor position.
Publisher
Sciencedomain International