Development and validation of qPCR methods for nucleic acid biomarkers as a drug development tool: points to consider

Author:

Sun Yuchen1ORCID,Nakamura Takahiro2,Ohtsu Yoshiaki3ORCID,Kakehi Masaaki4,Danno Noriyuki5,Shimizu Hiroyuki6,Tanaka Yoichi1ORCID,Serelli-Lee Victoria78ORCID,Tanaka Seiji9,Okayama Takashige10,Suda Yusuke11,Moriya Yuu4,Hanada Takeshi12,Saito Yoshiro1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Medicinal Safety Science, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan

2. Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd, Kagoshima, 891-1394, Japan

3. Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd, Shizuoka, 411-8731, Japan

4. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Limited, Kanagawa, 251-8555, Japan

5. CMIC Pharma Science Co., Ltd, Yamanashi, 408-0044, Japan

6. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Kanagawa, 251-8555, Japan

7. Eli Lilly Japan KK, Hyogo, 651-0086, Japan

8. Clinical evaluation sub-committee, Medicinal Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceuticals Manufacturers Association, Tokyo, 103-0023, Japan

9. ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Kanagawa, 251-8555, Japan

10. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, 300-2611, Japan

11. Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd, Kyoto, 601-8550, Japan

12. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Tokyo, 140-8710, Japan

Abstract

Nucleic acid (NA) biomarkers play critical roles in drug development. However, the global regulatory guidelines for assessing quantification methods specific to NA biomarkers are limited. The validation of analytical methods is crucial for the use of biomarkers in clinical and post-marketing evaluations of drug efficacy and adverse reactions. Given that quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and reverse transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) methods are the gold standards for the quantification of NA biomarkers, the Biomarker Analytical Method Validation Study Group in Japan has discussed considerations and made recommendations for the development and validation of qPCR- and RT-qPCR-based analytical methods for endogenous NA biomarkers as drug development tools. This white paper aims to contribute to the global harmonization of NA biomarker assay validation.

Funder

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

Publisher

Future Science Ltd

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Clinical Biochemistry,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Medicine,Analytical Chemistry

Reference26 articles.

1. Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement

2. Biomarker assay validation

3. Biomarker Assay Collaborative Evidentiary Considerations Writing Group, Critical Path Institute. Points to consider document. Scientific and regulatory considerations for the analytical validation of assays used in the qualification of biomarkers in biological matrices (2019). https://c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/evidconsid-whitepaper-analyticalsectionv2019.pdf

4. Analytical method validation for biomarkers as a drug development tool: points to consider

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3