Are natural products and medical diagnostic tests still eligible for patents in the USA?

Author:

Cockbain Julian1,Sterckx Sigrid2

Affiliation:

1. European Patent Attorney, Willow 42 Southmoor Road, Oxford OX2 6RD, UK.

2. Ghent University and Free University of Brussels (VUB), Belgium

Abstract

In 2010, the biotechnology and molecular diagnostics industries were shocked by the decision from a US District Court to the effect that isolated endogenous DNA and diagnostic tests based on newly discovered DNA sequences were not eligible for US patents. The case related to the BRCA1/2 genes for breast and ovarian cancer. On appeal, the decision was almost entirely overturned. However, in March 2012, the US Supreme Court vacated the appeal court decision and instructed the appeals court to rehear the case in the light of its very recent decision, which suggested that products of nature and their obvious uses should not be patentable. This commentary explores the points at issue.

Publisher

Future Science Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratorieset al.v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.566 U.S., 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012).

2. AMP v. USPTO, 653 F. 3d 1329 (Fed. Circ.) (2011).

3. European Patent Office.European Patent Convention, 14th Edition. European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (2010).

4. Diamond v. Chakrabarty. 447 U.S. 303 (1980).

5. Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. 333 U.S. 127 (1948).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3