Utilizing design of experiments to characterize assay robustness

Author:

Cowan Kyra J1,Erickson Rich2,Sue Brian2,Delarosa Reginald2,Gunter Bert3,Coleman Daniel A3,Gilbert Houston3,Song An2,Fischer Saloumeh Kadkhodayan2

Affiliation:

1. BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.

2. BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA

3. Nonclinical Biostatistics, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA

Abstract

Background: Design of experiments (DOE) is a systematic approach to assess the effects of many factors on a response of an assay. This paper provides a case study whereby DOE was successfully utilized to evaluate robustness parameters for a ligand-binding assay (LBA). Methodology: A 24-run Plackett–Burman design was developed to investigate factors that may have caused a lack of robustness in this particular LBA. We modeled five main effects and their ten two-way interactions, using the standard curve signal as the response. Results: By utilizing DOE, we were able to quickly identify the factors that affected our assay’s performance. The lack of robustness was attributed to the handling of the coat reagent. Factors that had an adverse effect on the coat material were vortexing and freeze–thaw cycles. Conclusion: We recommend that a robustness DOE be conducted prior to the validation of an assay for early identification of critical factors that may impact assay performance.

Publisher

Future Science Ltd

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Clinical Biochemistry,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Medicine,Analytical Chemistry

Reference27 articles.

1. Key elements of bioanalytical method validation for macromolecules

2. Some important considerations for validation of ligand-binding assays

3. Validation of Analytical Procedures, Q2B Methodology, Guidelines Prepared Within the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.1–9 (1996).

4. International Conference on Harmonization: Guideline on Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology; availability, Federal Register.62(96),(1997).

5. Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation. US Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Rockville, MD, USA (2001).

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3