Recommendations for singlet-based approach in ligand binding assays: an IQ Consortium perspective

Author:

Pillutla Renuka1,Gorovits Boris2,Gleason Carol1,Quiroz Jorge3,Christopher David3,Braun Manuela4,Brockus Catherine5,Donaldson Douglas6,Haslberger Tobias7,He Ling8,Qian Mark9,Sydor Jens10,Wickremsinhe Enaksha5,Williams Lakenya1

Affiliation:

1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA

2. Pfizer Inc., Andover, MA 01810, USA

3. Merck & Co Inc., NJ 08889, USA

4. Bayer AG, Berlin 13342, Germany

5. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA

6. Biogen Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA

7. AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen 67061, Germany

8. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ 07920, USA

9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge 02139, MA, USA

10. GSK, Upper Providence, PA 19426, USA

Abstract

Historically, ligand-binding assays for pharmacokinetic samples employed duplicate rather than singlet-based analysis. Herein, the Translational and absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) Sciences Leadership Group of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) presents a study aiming to determine the value of duplicate versus singlet-based testing. Based on analysis of data collected from eight organizations for 20 drug candidates representing seven molecular types and four analytical platforms, statistical comparisons of validation and in-study quality controls and study unknown samples demonstrated good agreement across duplicate sets. Simulation models were also used to assess the impact of sample duplicate characteristics on bioequivalence outcomes. Results show that testing in singlet is acceptable for assays with % CV ≤15% between duplicates. Singlet-based approach is proposed as the default for ligand-binding assays while a duplicate-based approach is needed where imprecision and/or inaccuracy impede the validation of the assay.

Publisher

Future Science Ltd

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Clinical Biochemistry,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Medicine,Analytical Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3