Incurred sample accuracy assessment: design of experiments based on standard addition

Author:

de Boer Theo,Wieling Jaap1

Affiliation:

1. QPS Netherlands, Bioanalysis & Drug Metabolism, Petrus Campersingel 123, 9713 AG Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

It is commonly acknowledged that random and systematic analytical errors contribute to poor data quality, and moreover, to imprecise and inaccurate pharmacokinetic parameters. To investigate the random errors in GLP bioanalysis, common ground has been found in today’s bioanalysis to assess the reproducibility of the method by reanalyzing part of the incurred samples. The undesired systematic errors in bioanalysis affecting the trueness of the method and leading to inaccurate data remain relatively unattended so far. In order to obtain both precise and accurate data it is suggested in this paper to apply standard addition experiments to calculate the relative systematic errors as an estimate for the incurred sample accuracy. This approach, which can be seen as an important extension to current guidelines in GLP bioanalysis, is illustrated by assessing the accuracy of the bioanalytical results for a bioequivalence study for alendronate.

Publisher

Future Science Ltd

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Clinical Biochemistry,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Medicine,Analytical Chemistry

Reference16 articles.

1. WielingJ, Oosterhuis B, Jonkman JHG. Consequences of variation of bioanalytical methods on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters: simulation and laboratory experience.In:Proceedings of Bio-International ‘94. Midha KK, Blume H (Eds). Medpharm Scientific Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany,371–384 (1995).

2. Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation

3. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Topic Q2(R1): validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology (2005).

4. Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3