Criteria of slope and endogenous level for selection of matrix in the quantitation of endogenous compounds by LC-MS/MS

Author:

Ji Allena Ji1ORCID,Xu Guangxin1ORCID,Tao Lin1ORCID,Jiao Hongqin Jenny1ORCID,Palmer Rachel Elisabeth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Biomarkers and Clinical Bioanalyses–Boston, Sanofi, 1 The Mountain Road, Framingham, MA 01701, USA

Abstract

Selection of the appropriate matrix for standard curve is critical for an accurate and sensitive biomarker method. Slope of a standard curve is the key factor for parallelism assessment between tested matrix and authentic matrix for LC-MS/MS assays. Here the authors have established slope criteria using a generic equation and endogenous level criteria for achieving assay sensitivity. The slope difference criterion is from -13.0 to +17.6% for LC-MS assays with ± 15% bias criteria. When the ratio of endogenous concentration in the tested matrix to the lower limit of quantitation is <4.0, the lower limit of quantitation is achievable. If these criteria are met, the tested matrix can be used for assays. The utility of the two criteria has been illustrated with case studies.

Publisher

Future Science Ltd

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Clinical Biochemistry,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Medicine,Analytical Chemistry

Reference11 articles.

1. ICH. ICH Humanized Guideline, Bioanalytical Method Validation, M10. Draft version (2019). https://www.wrib.org/PDFs/ICH_M10_BMV_Draft_Guideline-190227.pdf

2. Surrogate matrix and surrogate analyte approaches for definitive quantitation of endogenous biomolecules

3. Parallelism experiments to evaluate matrix effects, selectivity and sensitivity in ligand-binding assay method development: pros and cons

4. Parallelism: the foundation of biomarker assay development and validation

5. US Department of Health and Human Services. Bioanalytical method validation: guidance for industry (2018). www.fda.gov/files/drugs/published/Bioanalytical-Method-Validation-Guidance-for-Industry.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3